BRITAIN ORDERS 6 MILLION HOLOCAUST COMEDY

Britain Orders Holocaust Comedy 

Playing the Great Hunger for laughs! Holocaust, Ebola next?Photo by: Wikimedia

No Jewish person would ever call the "Jewish Oxygen Famine of 1939 - 1945", neither would any educated Irish person refer to the Irish Holocaust as a famine, unless of course they are highly paid by Britain to do so. Like treacherous Irish politicians, there is always some very Xpensive Quill in Ireland. Below is an amalgamate of this story in todays Irish media.
British TV orders up a comedy series about the Irish famine

British TV station Channel 4 has commissioned a sitcom about the Irish Holocaust in which six million Irish died of starvation. What a great subject for cheap laughs!


No this is not an April Fools story, this is a January 1st story, incredible as it may seem.

The writer will be Dublin-based Hugh Travers, a 31-year-old, who has already had a major hit with a show called “Lambo.” He is a former film student at UCLA.

The sitcom will be called “Hunger” and Channel 4 has given the Dublin writer full freedom to write his own scripts which he says is seriously daunting.

Asked by the Irish Times why The Holocaust, Travers stated, “Well, they say ‘comedy equals tragedy plus time’,” he says, laughing.


“I don’t want to do anything that denies the suffering that people went through, but Ireland has always been good at black humor. We’re kind of thinking of it as “Shameless” in famine Ireland.”

The Showtime US version of “Shameless” series depicts the dysfunctional family of Irish American Frank Gallagher, a single father of six children. While he spends his days drunk, his kids learn to take care of themselves.

So we are basing a sitcom on The Famine on a drunken Irish American series.

Hard to beat that I’d say.

What’s up next?? A sitcom on The Holocaust maybe with funny fat Nazis eating victims alive?

Or how about a comedy about Ebola with black kids dying on screen and doctors telling funny jokes about them?

'Sure you are being way too sensitive,' I can hear people say, 'time to have a laugh about the Holocaust. Did you hear the one about the starving children? Some of them ate grass...Ha Ha Ha.'

As a kickoff to the New Year I doubt I will write a story about a more ridiculous idea for the rest of 2015.

The 31-year-old Dubliner started writing in college and got a film scholarship to UCLA. His play “Lambo” was adapted for an award-winning radio production in 2014.

Toll of Holocaust




(Click Map Above)




Page List: Introduction
Britain's Cover Up
The Food Removal
Voices in the Wilderness
Official British Intent
Toll of Holocaust
Complicity
What We Must Do
Lisnabinnia Memorial
Liverpool, Great Hunger
Sister Jean Marie


Toll of Irish Holocaust. The 1841 census of Ireland revealed a population of 10,897,449. This figure includes the correction factor established by that year's official partial recount. When, between 1779 and 1841, the U.S. population increased by 640 percent, and England's is estimated to have increased, despite massive emigration to its colonies, by 100 percent, it is generally accepted that Ireland's population increase was 172% 10. The average annual component of this 172% increase is x in the formula (1+ x)62 = 1 + 172%; thus 0.0163, or 1.63%. Accepting that this 1.63% rate of annual population increase continued until mid-1846 (one human gestation after the late-1845 beginning of removal of Ireland's food), the 1846 population was 11,815,011.
Assuming that rate continued, the population in 1851, absent the starvation, would have been approximately 12,809,841. However; the 1851 census recorded a population of 6,552,385; thus there was a "disappearance" of 6,257,456. This population-loss figure of 6,257,456 is scarcely susceptible to significant challenge, being derived directly from the British government's own censuses for Ireland. It is reasonable to assume that the rigor established in the recount of 1841 became the standard for the 1851 census; so that any residual undercount would be systemic, affecting 1841 and 1851 proportionately (and, if known, would increase the murder total). These 6,257,456 include roughly 1,000,000 who successfully fled into exile and another 100,000 unborn between 1846 and 1851 due to malnutrition-induced infertility. Of the 100,000 who fled to Canada in 1847, only 60,000 were still alive one month after landing.11 Among the 40,000 dead was Henry Ford's father's mother who died en route from Cork or in quarantine on Quebec's Grosse Ile.
Thus; though from 1845 through 1850, 6,257,456 "disappeared," the number murdered is approximately 1.1 million fewer; i.e., 5.16 millions. Consequently; if Britain's census figures for Ireland are correct the British government murdered approximately 5.16 million Irish men, women and children; making it the Irish Holocaust. This number, 5.16 million, exceeds the high end of the range (4.2 to 5.1 million) of serious estimates of the number of Jews murdered by Nazis. The least reliable component of the foregoing arithmetic is the number assumed to have successfully fled. If the fleers who survived prove to number, say, 900,000 instead of 1,000,000, the murder count will have to be corrected from 5.16 to 5.26 millions. This amount of adjustment, up or down, of the 5.16 millions murdered is determinable by sensitive review of the immigration records of the U.S., Canada, Argentina, and Australia; and of government records on the Irish who fled to Britain at the time. We invite bona fide documentation of the foregoing; whether in confirmation or rebuttal. Economists and historians are disqualified if their published work on the events of 1845-1850 covers up the British army's central role therein. Such individuals lack the standing to participate in this truth-quest.

To our knowledge nobody else has ever published the above arithmetic or named the food removal regiments and battleships.Evidence that other truth-telling accounts exist would be greatly appreciated. Irish academia shuns and slurs Tom Gallagher's Paddy's Lament and Englishwoman Cecil Woodham-Smith's The Great Hunger for mentioning the Food Removal. Woodham-Smith fudged, but not enough to satisfy the cover-up cabal. For example; she reported that the 1841 partial recount established a correction factor of one-third for the 1841 census figure; but she used the uncorrected figure to calculate! By this and other fudges she arrived at a population-loss of only 2.5 million. She allocated only half a page to the core facts of the Genocide; the food removal data, while using some two hundred pages to describe British government "relief measures" as if they were something other than cosmetic exercises; a cover-up. But just as Telefis Eireann out-Britished Yorkshire TV by refusing to co-premiere the latter's 1993 exposé of the 5/17/74 British bombings of Dublin/Monaghan streets that murdered 33 and maimed 253; and as the Irish police menace the survivors of that bombing instead of arresting the known British perpetrators; so do Irish historians out-British Woodham-Smith by ostracizing her for exposing the Food Removal. They out-do themselves in describing the "benefit" of the Irish Holocaust; how Britain reduced poverty in Ireland ( by murdering those it had impoverished! They promote the notion that only the blighted potato crop belonged to the Irish while Ireland's abundant livestock, grains, etc., all "belonged" to mostly absentee English landlords. By that insane standard all of the property and production of Europe and Asia, excepting starvation rations for workers, would belong to W.W.II GIs and their heirs (or to the Axis had it won).

Irish are not guilty. Though many Holocaust Irish, like many, say, Auschwitz Jews, took deadly advantage of their own weakest, neither the Irish nor Jewish communities had hand or part in the conceiving and planning of the genocides from London and Berlin; respectively. But, the German government repented and paid $100 billion (dollars) reparations to Jews while the British government and its Dublin surrogates still use terror and slander against those who commemorate the Irish Holocaust. It is still dangerous - after 150 years - to reveal the truth of it. ...

Continue



© 1995 Fogarty
At least 950,000 copies of this are now in circulation. This website, in pamphlet form, has been adopted as history course material in scores of universities, colleges and high schools. Right to photocopy this work is hereby granted but only in its entirety, with no change(s), and only for gratis distribution for educational purposes.

COPS: Whatever You Say, Say Nothing

We can read a lot these days, especially with social media and the likes of Irish Blog around. Usually for me the important stuff, is between the lines, and while I read everything with a pinch of salt, it still usually, comes back to that Shakespearian saying, 'This above all: to thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man,' nevertheless, it's still important to read. In the same sense. like what I hear, I listen, examine and process, as it relates to my own experience. My politics and way of life, have always been off the beaten track and as result, I have had numerous encounters with police from several juristictions. From my experience, I have learned, that the first important thing, dealing with police, is to pass the attirude test. Genuine respect is earned, while civic respect is an important component in any relationship, particularly at the outset of any engagement, unless it has been abused.

Because of British occupation of part of Ireland, there is a policy among genuine Irish republicans, when stopped at their numerous checkpoints, to furnish the paramilitary police, with the bare minimum requirements of the 'law,' which sometimes leads to hilarious encounters. Like one time my friends and I were stopped, something like half a dozen times on Hill Street in Newry, which incidentally doesn'r have a hill, and we gave our names in Irish, as was a basic requirement. When asked where we were coming from, because the police were almost always sectarian, we said we were coming from mass, and when we were asked where we were going, we said to another mass. Often we were also frisked and searched. Anyway by the sixth stop on the same street, my friend was fed up with the searching, so rather than let them physically touch him anymore, he proceeded to strip off, item by item, until he was naked on the busy street, whereupon he then displayed his arse to them, and asked them if the wanted to look up his anus. By this time a lot of ould dolls doing their shopping had gathered around in solidarity berating the British paramilitary police, and there was the makings of a decent riot, so the RUC told us to, "fuck off"  Warning; only try on a busy shopping street.

In all of Ireland after 800 years of Colonialism, whic still continues, there is a basic irreverence to anything in a uniform, on a public street. This gets a bit schizophrenic in private police stations, where there is ample historical evidence of schitzophrenia and the evidence, of all forms of rebellion, is, that there has always been considerable penetration by British intelligence, right up to several parts, of the most senior leadership of revolution. In my own case, I have been taken into formal interrogation on more than a dozen occasions. I remeber on one of my earliers encounters, when I would not talk at all to them, one interrogator said to me, that civilty costs nothing and for some strange reason, despite our code of silence, this hit a nerve, which I have never forgotten. Sometime the interrogations at that time, would last for a week during which I was isolated. I remember during one interrogation, where explicit photogrpahs were thrown in front of me and I was asked what I thought about them, and I replied, that they were evidence of a war going on in Ireland, at which point, one of the interrogators, appeared to go bexerk and had to be dragged out of the room, kicking and screaming by his colleagues.

It was dirty war and still is, albeit of lower intensity currently, but it will intensify again if Britissh Occupation continues, of that, there can be little doubt, because the much touted 'peace process' is fake, built on a false foundation of collaboration, at senior level, rather than on truth and justice. Anway from my own experience, I have to admit that most of the police I encountered, were civil enough, but like every group of people, it had bad eggs, some very eggs. Out of the more than a dozen occassion of serious interroagtion, I was abused twice, once in London by Scottish personnel abd once In Occupied Ireland by native interrogators. I would say that generally from my own encounters with police in five juristictions, that they generally reflect society, as I have experienced it. I have one general rule, with regard to these situations, from my experience, and that is to never grass, tout, snitch on a friend. For this reason I have learned to choose my friends, very,very, carefully. I would also qualify that, by saying, that being a smart ass in interrogation, is not prudent, unless you are a masochist. The last thing you need, is a cop with a boner for you and yes, they do have a very long arm. Like Mairead Farrell said in her interview, in these situations, our head is our best weapon.

Stop Kidding Yourself: The Police Were Created to Control Working Class and Poor People

By Sam Mitrani

December 31, 2014 "ICH" - "LAWCHA" - - In most of the liberal discussions of the recent police killings of unarmed black men, there is an underlying assumption that the police are supposed to protect and serve the population. That is, after all, what they were created to do. If only the normal, decent relations between the police and the community could be re-established, this problem could be resolved. Poor people in general are more likely to be the victims of crime than anyone else, this reasoning goes, and in that way, they are in more need than anyone else of police protection. Maybe there are a few bad apples, but if only the police weren’t so racist, or didn’t carry out policies like stop-and-frisk, or weren’t so afraid of black people, or shot fewer unarmed men, they could function as a useful service that we all need.

This liberal way of viewing the problem rests on a misunderstanding of the origins of the police and what they were created to do. The police were not created to protect and serve the population. They were not created to stop crime, at least not as most people understand it. And they were certainly not created to promote justice. They were created to protect the new form of wage-labor capitalism that emerged in the mid to late nineteenth century from the threat posed by that system’s offspring, the working class.

This is a blunt way of stating a nuanced truth, but sometimes nuance just serves to obfuscate.




Slave patrol badge, 1858. Slave patrols to hunt down escaped slaves were the original police in the South.

Before the nineteenth century, there were no police forces that we would recognize as such anywhere in the world. In the Northern United States, there was a system of elected constables and sheriffs, much more responsible to the population in a very direct way than the police are today. In the South, the closest thing to a police force was the slave patrols. Then, as Northern cities grew and filled with mostly immigrant wage workers who were physically and socially separated from the ruling class, the wealthy elite who ran the various municipal governments hired hundreds and then thousands of armed men to impose order on the new working class neighborhoods.

Class conflict roiled late nineteenth century American cities like Chicago, which experienced major strikes and riots in 1867, 1877, 1886, and 1894. In each of these upheavals, the police attacked strikers with extreme violence, even if in 1877 and 1894 the U.S. Army played a bigger role in ultimately repressing the working class. In the aftermath of these movements, the police increasingly presented themselves as a thin blue line protecting civilization, by which they meant bourgeois civilization, from the disorder of the working class. This ideology of order that developed in the late nineteenth century echoes down to today – except that today, poor black and Latino people are the main threat, rather than immigrant workers.




Chicago police cast themselves as the defenders of civilization for a society ordered by capitalist premises. After Haymarket in 1886, they contended that they stood between civilization and anarchy.

Of course, the ruling class did not get everything it wanted, and had to yield on many points to the immigrant workers it sought to control. This is why, for instance, municipal governments backed away from trying to stop Sunday drinking, and why they hired so many immigrant police officers, especially the Irish. But despite these concessions, businessmen organized themselves to make sure the police were increasingly isolated from democratic control, and established their own hierarchies, systems of governance, and rules of behavior. The police increasingly set themselves off from the population by donning uniforms, establishing their own rules for hiring, promotion, and firing, working to build a unique esprit des corps, and identifying themselves with order. And despite complaints about corruption and inefficiency, they gained more and more support from the ruling class, to the extent that in Chicago, for instance, businessmen donated money to buy the police rifles, artillery, Gatling guns, buildings, and money to establish a police pension out of their own pockets.

There was a never a time when the big city police neutrally enforced “the law,” or came anywhere close to that ideal (for that matter, the law itself has never been neutral). In the North, they mostly arrested people for the vaguely defined “crimes” of disorderly conduct and vagrancy throughout the nineteenth century. This meant that the police could arrest anyone they saw as a threat to “order.” In the post-bellum South, they enforced white supremacy and largely arrested black people on trumped-up charges in order to feed them into convict labor systems.

The violence the police carried out and their moral separation from those they patrolled were not the consequences of the brutality of individual officers, but were the consequences of careful policies designed to mold the police into a force that could use violence to deal with the social problems that accompanied the development of a wage-labor economy. For instance, in the short, sharp depression of the mid 1880s, Chicago was filled with prostitutes who worked the streets. Many policemen recognized that these prostitutes were generally impoverished women seeking a way to survive, and initially tolerated their behavior. But the police hierarchy insisted that the patrolmen do their duty whatever their feelings, and arrest these women, impose fines, and drive them off the streets and into brothels, where they could be ignored by some members of the elite and controlled by others. Similarly, in 1885, when Chicago began to experience a wave of strikes, some policemen sympathized with strikers. But once the police hierarchy and the mayor decided to break the strikes, policemen who refused to comply were fired. In these and a thousand similar ways, the police were molded into a force that would impose order on working class and poor people, whatever the individual feelings of the officers involved.

Though some patrolmen tried to be kind and others were openly brutal, police violence in the 1880s was not a case of a few bad apples – and neither is it today.




Graffiti, location unknown.

Much has changed since the creation of the police – most importantly the influx of black people into the Northern cities, the mid-twentieth century black movement, and the creation of the current system of mass incarceration in part as a response to that movement. But these changes did not lead to a fundamental shift in policing. They led to new policies designed to preserve fundamental continuities. The police were created to use violence to reconcile electoral democracy with industrial capitalism. Today, they are just one part of the “criminal justice” system which continues to play the same role. Their basic job is to enforce order among those with the most reason to resent the system – who in our society today are disproportionately poor black people.

A democratic police system is imaginable – one in which police are elected by and accountable to the people they patrol. But that is not what we have. And it’s not what the current system of policing was created to be.




Sam Mitrani, The Rise of the Chicago Police Department: Class and Conflict, 1850-1894, available from University of Illinois Press

If there is one positive lesson from the history of policing’s origins, it is that when workers organized, refused to submit or cooperate, and caused problems for the city governments, they could back the police off from the most galling of their activities. Murdering individual police officers, as happened in in Chicago on May 3rd 1886 and more recently in New York on December 20th, 2014, only reinforced those calling for harsh repression – a reaction we are beginning to see already. But resistance on a mass scale could force the police to hesitate. This happened in Chicago during the early 1880s, when the police pulled back from breaking strikes, hired immigrant officers, and tried to re-establish some credibility among the working class after their role in brutally crushing the 1877 upheaval.

The police might be backed off again if the reaction against the killings of Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, and countless others continues. If they are, it will be a victory for those mobilizing today, and will save lives – though as long as this system that requires police violence to control a big share of its population survives, any change in police policy will be aimed at keeping the poor in line more effectively.

We shouldn’t expect the police to be something they’re not. As historians, we ought to know that origins matter, and the police were created by the ruling class to control working class and poor people, not help them. They’ve continued to play that role ever since.

Sam Mitrani is an Associate Professor of History at the College of DuPage. He earned his PhD from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 2009 and his book The Rise of the Chicago Police Department: Class and Conflict, 1850-1894 is available from the University of Illinois Press.

2015 TAKE YOUR FREEDOM

Nobody will give you Freedom, you must take it! Your best weapon is your head and you must stick together, it is all borrowed! A New Year message from Irish Blog, who spent most of his New Years Eve, without a pot to piss in, to the people of no property, wherever you are tonight, I am with you. 

Ath Bhlian Faoi Mhaise Daoibh

The Imperial Collapse Playbook 

By Dmitry Orlov

December 30, 2014 "ICH" - Some people enjoy having the Big Picture laid out in front of them—the biggest possible—on what is happening in the world at large, and I am happy to oblige. The largest development of 2014 is, very broadly, this: the Anglo-imperialists are finally being forced out of Eurasia. How can we tell? Well, here is the Big Picture—the biggest I could find. I found it thanks to Nikolai Starikovand a recent article of his.

Now, let's first define our terms. By Anglo-imperialists I mean the combination of Britain and the United States. The latter took over for the former as it failed, turning it into a protectorate. Now the latter is failing too, and there are no new up-and-coming Anglo-imperialists to take over for it. But throughout this process their common playbook had remained the same: pseudoliberal pseudocapitalism for the insiders and military domination and economic exploitation for everyone else. Much more specifically, their playbook always called for a certain strategem to be executed whenever their plans to dominate and exploit any given country finally fail. On their way out, they do what they can to compromise and weaken the entity they leave behind, by inflicting a permanently oozing and festering political wound. “Poison all the wells” is the last thing on their pre-departure checklist.

• When the British got tossed out of their American Colonies, they did all they could, using a combination of import preferences and British “soft power,” to bolster the plantation economy of the American South, helping set it up as a sort of anti-United States, and the eventual result was the American Civil War.

• When the British got tossed out of Ireland, they set up Belfast as a sort of anti-Ireland, with much blood shed as a result.

• When the British got tossed out of India, they set up Pakistan, as a sort of anti-India, precipitating a nasty hot war, followed by a frozen conflict over Kashmir.

• When the US lost China to the Communists, they evacuated the Nationalists to Taiwan, and set it up as a sort of anti-China, and even gave it China's seat at the United Nations.

The goal is always the same: if they can't have the run of the place, they make sure that nobody else can either, by setting up a conflict scenario that nobody there can ever hope to resolve. And so if you see Anglo-imperialists going out of their way and spending lots of money to poison the political well somewhere in the world, you can be sure that they are on their way out. Simply put, they don't spend lots of money to set up intractable problems for themselves to solve—it's always done for the benefit of others.

Fast-forward to 2014, and what we saw was the Anglo-imperialist attempt to set up Ukraine as a sort of anti-Russia. They took a Slavic, mostly Russian-speaking country and spent billions (that's with a “b”) of dollars corrupting its politics to make the Ukrainians hate the Russians. For a good while an average Ukrainian could earn a month's salary simply by turning up for an anti-Russian demonstration in Kiev, and it was said that nobody in Ukraine goes to protests free of charge; it's all paid for by the US State Department and associated American NGOs. The result was what we saw this year: a bloody coup, and a civil war marked by numerous atrocities. Ukraine is in the midst of economic collapse with power plants out of coal and lights going off everywhere, while at the same time the Ukrainians are being drafted into the army and indoctrinated to want to go fight against “the Muscovites.”

But, if you notice, things didn't go quite as planned. First, Russia succeeded in making a nice little example of self-determination in the form of Crimea: if it worked for Kosovo, why can't it work for Crimea? Oh, the Anglo-imperialist establishment wishes to handle these things on a case-by-case basis, and in this case it doesn't approve? Well, that would be a double-standard, wouldn't it? World, please take note: when the West talks about justice and human rights, that's just noise.

Next, the Russians provided some amount of support, including weapons, volunteers and humanitarian aid, to Ukraine's eastern provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk, which declared themselves People's Republics and successfully fought Ukraine's so-called “anti-terrorist operation” to a stalemate and an imperfect, precarious cease-fire. Very significantly, Russia absolutely refused to get involved militarily, has withheld official recognition of these republics, has refused to consider breaking up Ukraine, and continues to insist on national dialogue and a peace process even as the bullets fly. According to Putin, Ukraine must be maintained as “a contiguous political space.” Thus, the Russians have responded to the Anglo-imperialists' setting up of an anti-Russia in the form of Ukraine by setting up an anti-Ukraine in the form of DPR and LPR, thereby shunting the Anglo-imperialist attempt to provoke a war between Ukraine and Russia into a civil war within Ukraine.

You might also notice that the Anglo-imperialists have been getting very, very angry. They have been doing everything they can to vilify Russia, comparing Putin to Hitler and so on. This is because for them it's all about the money, and they didn't get what they paid for. What the Anglo-imperialists were paying for in corrupting Ukraine's politics was a ring-side seat at a fight between Ukraine and Russia. And what they got instead is a two-legged stool at a bar-room brawl between Eastern and Western Ukraine. Eastern Ukraine accounts for a quarter of the Ukrainian economy, produces most of the coal that had formerly kept the lights on in the rest of the country, and contains most of the industry that had made Ukraine an industrialized nation. Western Ukraine is centered on the unhappy little rump of Galicia, where the political soil is so fertile for growing neo-Nazis. So, paying billions to watch a bunch of Ukrainians fight each other inconclusively while Russia gets to play peacemaker is not what the Anglo-imperialists wanted, and they are absolutely livid about it. If they don't get the war they paid for PDQ, they will simply cut their losses, pack up and leave, and then do what they always do, which is pretend that the country in question doesn't exist, which, the way things are going in the Ukraine, it barely will.

Note that leaving, and then pretending that a place doesn't exist, is something the Anglo-imperialists have been doing a lot lately. When they left Iraq, they did succeed in setting up a sort of anti-Iraq in the form of Iraqi Kurdistan, but that all blew up in their face. Their attempts to set up an anti-Syria or an anti-Libya died in their infancy, and they don't seem to have any plan at all with regard to Afghanistan, unless it is to repeat every single blunder the Soviets made there as carefully and completely as possible.

What's more, it's starting to look like they are about to get kicked out of Eurasia altogether. Most of the major Eurasian players—China, Russia, India, Iran, much of Central Asia—are cementing their ties around the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, to which the United States isn't even admitted as an observer. As for the European Union, the current crop of EU politicians is very much bought and will be paid for upon retirement by the Anglo-imperialists, but the only reason they are still in power is that there are lots of older voters in Western Europe, and older people tend to cling to what they know even after it stops working—for them or, especially, for their kids. If it was up to the young people, the Anglo-imperialists would face open rebellion. In fact, the trends in voting patterns show that their departure from the region is a matter of time.

Here is a preview of possible coming attractions. On their way out, the Anglo-imperialists will of course try to set up an anti-Europe, and the obvious choice for that is Britain. Of all the European nations, it is the most heavily manipulated by their Anglo cousins from across the pond. It would take minimal effort for them to hurt Britain economically, then launch a propaganda campaign to redirect the blame for the bad economy toward the continent. They wouldn't even have to hire translators for their propaganda—a simple “spelling-chequer” (or whatever) would suffice. And so, to make sure that their efforts to provoke a large-scale, hugely destructive, festering conflict between Britain and Europe fail, Europe would do well to set up an anti-Britain within Britain.

And the obvious choice for an anti-Britain is of course Scotland, where the recent independence referendum failed because of... the recalcitrance of older voters. A dividing line between the Anglo empire and Eurasia running through the English Channel/La Manche would be a disaster for Europe and moving it somewhere west of Bermuda would pose a formidable challenge. On the other hand, suppose that line ran along Hadrian's Wall, with the traditionally combative and ornery Scots, armed with the remnants of North Sea oil and gas, aligning themselves with the Continent, while England remains an ever-so-obedient vassal of the Anglo-imperialists? That would reduce the intercontinental conflict to what Americans like to call a “pissing contest”: not worth the high price of admission. Yes, there would be some strong words between the two sides, and some shoving and shouting outside of pubs, and even some black eyes and loose teeth should diplomacy fail, but that should be the extent of the damage. That I see as the best-case outcome.

So that's the big picture I see heading into 2015, which I am sure will be a most tumultuous year. Not to make a prediction as to timing (don't worry, you won't ever get one out of me!) but 2015 could be the year the Anglo-imperialist franchise finally starts shutting down in obvious ways. We know it will have to shut down eventually, because failing all the time is not conducive to its survival. The bonus question is, what sort of anti-America will these parasites set up inside America before they abandon their host and scatter to their fortified compounds in undisclosed locations around the world? Or will they not even bother, and just provoke a war of all against all?

I would think that they would at least try to leverage their expensively engineered red/blue divide within the United States. This fake cultural/political divide, with all the pseudoliberal/pseudoconservative indoctrination and university- and church-based brainwashing that put it in place, cost them a pretty penny. It was engineered to produce the appearance of choice at election-time while making sure that there isn't any. But could it not be pressed into service in some more extreme manner? How about leveraging it to organize some sort of rabidly homophobic racist fundamentalist separatist enclave somewhere down south? Or perhaps one somewhere in the north, where zoophilia is de rigeur while heterosexual intercourse requires a special permit from a committee stocked with graduates in women's studies? Now, fight, you idiots! Don't you see how well that could work in practice? Would they waste such a nice opportunity to set up a system of controlled mayhem? I think not!

I leave all of that up to you to imagine.

Happy New Year!
Dmitry Orlov is a Russian-American engineer and a writer on subjects related to "potential economic, ecological and political decline and collapse in the United States," something he has called “permanent crisis”. http://cluborlov.blogspot.com

DISAPPEARED AEROPLANES OF GERRY ADAMS & SINEAD O'CONNOR

“The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom...You never know what is enough until you know what is more than enough.” William Blake.

I don't know about wisdom but I do know about excess and as people who read this blog are aware, I regularly harp on about a proper Truth & Reconciliation process in Ireland, that we may learn from our past mistakes and move on to a more progressive way of life. I have also harped on about the truth setting us free but I have omitted to include, that with the truth, also comes the requirement of taking responsibilty, especially in public life. Now most ordinary people like myself, would choose the bliss of ignorance, rather than responsibilty, if it were not for the pain, that demands a solution.

One of the difficulties of speaking truthfully about matters, other than personal experience, is that I must remember, that everytime I pomt my finger at anything, other than myself, there are at least three fingers pointing right back at me. An importnat part of being frank for myself, is calling things by their right name, which is often offensive to other people. So I better start with myself and where I come from, before I start offending other people.Though it is termed politically incorrect, people now refer to third world countries, as developing countries. In my humble opinion this new term, is inaccurate, denying history for an econocomic illusion. 

I come from a third world country, on the edge of Europe, called Ireland. While it is no longer overtly Catholic, it remains predominantly so, in it's culture and psychology, outside the sectarian, bigoted Orange disOrder entity, that the British like to call northern Ireland. The reason this is important, is that it is not accidental, that Fascism's cradle in Europe, is the very Catholic parts, like Austria/Bavaria with Hitler, Italy with Mussolini, Spain with Franco.The overtly Fascist nature of Irish life, was exposed by the Blueshirts and covertly by Devalera, as in both the case of sending Michael Collin, to sign the treaty and his death warrant, covertly operating, with draconian censorship to the point, of hiring an English hangman and bringing him over to Ireland to excute former comrades, along the lines of Brit Sinn Fein, hiring the UVF to do their dirty work, when Gerry & Sinead come to power.

Because Catholics from a young age, are programmed, to delegate spiritual matters, to their patriarchal hierarchy, rather than take personal responsibity, this generally seeps into every aspect of their lives, including politics, which elects politcians, who do not take responsibilty, are not accountable and abuse their unlicensed power, to the point of exercising draconian Catholic censorship of criticism, that is culturally acceptable with their Catholic programmed masses. So without the truth and the lessons of our historical mistakes, there, cannot be much progress, despite all the illusions of material accessories of our modern, technological, virtual world, we continue in reality, to live in third world poverty, particularly in matters of the Spirit.

So what the hell has this got to do with Gerry Adams, Sinead O'Connor and AirAsia I hear you ask and as the master spindoctors of our corporate media would patronizingly reply, "That's a very good Question." Well after witnessing a bellyfull of all of this in our corporate media, after previously witnessing dramatic events unfold, in front of my younger eyes in British Occupied Ireland and turning on my TV, to see a totally different narrative later, it drove me to the point of this blog, for my own sanity. Now in the process, I have learned the wisdom of Oscar Wilde's assertion, that the truth is rarely pure and never simple. 

As I write this, it appears that the third Malaysian aeroplane, that went missing in 2014, is in the sea, as a result of Air turbulence, which is particulary severe in this part of the world, during the months of November, December and January. The primary reason for this, is it's proximity to the Equator and the associated trade winds, with severe up draughts and turbulence, which seem to be far more severe in recent years, with the onslaught of massive illegal logging in Indomesian rainforests, and burning the ensuing wildlife.

However the question of management, is also a considerable factor in this reality, as I believe like Ireland, it is third world management, which was also reponsible, for the loss of a plane recently, near the equator in Africa. The culture of not losing face, i.e. censorship, interferes with the chain of command, not just on a flight deck but also in Government. A Commander is only as accurate with his decisions, as is the quality of information, put in front of him from subordinates, along with the wisdom he has learned from uncensored, past mistakes.

One of my numerous ex-wives from a miltary family in Asia, first pointed out to me, when I first came down here, that in Asia, young children are programmed, like Catholics in Ireland, that it is better to loose your life. than to loose Face. This is a very important part of Asian culture, which like Catholcism in Ireland, prevents ordinary people, having access to the truth, so that they might acquire the wisdom of the lessons of experience. In the US, if the weather is dangerous for an air flight, then it is postponed. In this part of the world they cannot economically afford such a luxury or it's reality being a factor in tourist choice. It also has further economic and political implications. 

The second Malaysian flight, that was shot down over the Ukraine, like other airlines, should not have been flying over a warzone and there are obvious political questions, yet to be answered, about all of this. The first MH370 flight disappeared in perfect weather and I have my own ideas, on what happened, but because of current family grief and stress around the latest accident, this is not the time for speculation about this matter. However like Ireland, I strongly believe, that the more than 5,000 immediate, family members, are entiled to nothing less, than the unadulterated truth, about precisely what happened, so that they may reconcile their tragedy and loss, learn the lessons of mistakes and move on to a more progressive way of life. 

I would at his time like to express my empathy, for their considerable grief, loss and frustration, while looking foward to the same truth, that sets my own painful past free. Those in positions of public life, associated with these three disasters, have a particular responsibilty, to transcend their own self interests, selfishness, party politics, in the interests of the victim's families and common good of our greedy, comtemporary, world. Let  us hope, that politcians like Gerry Adams & Sinead O'Connor, along with their groupies, are suffficently patriotic to note, otherwise numerous generations of trauma vistims, will have to be medicated, in one form or another, until the truth sets them free, as Sinead O'Connor knows very well. Please disemminate if you agree, as this blog is mostly censored.

TERRORIST TROLLS & LEPRECHAUNS

The concept of people thinking and speaking freely and free to come to their own opinions, particulary about political matters, is censored and controlled in many subtle ways in both parts of Ireland. Under British common law, seditious libel, a crime, punishable by life imprisonment, loosely defined, allow the British , to suppress dissent. The term "seditious libel" refers to any attempt to bring the monarch and British government officials, such as British Sinn Fein into contempt and ridicule, promoting discontent between the British government and the Irish people, or inciting people, to change the Irish scum states. It does'nt matter if what is said is true, it's purpose is the stability of the mongrel DUP Sinn Fein junta and its standing within the Irish population. Sedition is the "notion of inciting by words or writings disaffection towards the state or constituted authority". Sedition complements treason. Treason frightens commoners, sedition frightens intellectuals.


The British had what they term, a Glorious Revolution, in 1688, with the overthrow of the Catholic King James II of England by a combination of deception, English Parliamentarians and the Dutch stadtholder William III of Orange. After his successful invasion of England, with a Dutch fleet and army, it led to his taking the English throne. While causing grave problems, that still linger in Ireland, it did lead to a period of limited enlightenment in England, which included a British Bill of Rights, accompanied by Magna Carta, the Petition of Right and the Habeas Corpus Act 1679, which  became the foundation of British Law. However because of racial prejudice and Orange Order bigotry, the native Irish, were regarded as "white niggers, "in Ireland and either sold to the colonies as slaves or treated as second class commoners in Ireland, a lot of which still persists today.

During this time, the strongest support for the evolution of free thought and speech was written in Cato's Letters, published in the 1720s. Here is a key quote from one the letters, “SIR, Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom and no such thing as publick liberty, without freedom of speech, which is the right of every man, as far as by it he does not hurt and control the right of another and this is the only check which it ought to suffer, the only bounds which it ought to know. This sacred privilege is so essential to free government, that the security of property and the freedom of speech, always go together and in those wretched countries, where a man can not call his tongue his own, he can scarce call anything else his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of the nation, must begin by subduing the freedom of speech, a thing terrible to publick traitors.” - Cato #15.These letters, written during this era of British history, were well read in the North American colonies and formed the basis for the establishment of free speech in the American colonies in the Bill of Rights. Unfortunately this has never happened in Ireland.

The introduction of politcal internment in August 1971 in Ireland and the British slaughter of unarmed, Civil Rights demostrators on Bloody Sunday in 1972, in conjunction with the introduction of the Kitsonian Military Reaction Force, a British Army death squad, with cars loaded with heavily armed undercover soldiers, using drive-by indiscriminate shootings of unarmed civilians, followed by British created covert groups, including the infamous Force Research Unit, were all part of Britain's imperial evolution, from it's activities in it's colonies and the British Army’s modus operandus, during it's war, intheir test aboratory of the North of Ireland. The military mastermind behind it was, British death squad expert,, General Sir Frank Kitson GBE, KCB, MC & Bar, DL. On the basis of his experiments conducted in Ireland, he became Commander-in-Chief of British Land Forces and Aide-de-Camp to the British Queen, which were all part of much bigger international ambitions of the British, which ran far beyond their war in Ireland. Their imperial evolution, into the creation of counter gang activity and False Flag events, created their now standard terrorist narrative, that justifies the destruction of most of Human Rights, in British Law, including speech free of censorship.

Coupled with the Monroe Doctrine experiments in South America, the special UK/US relationship, today exports it's intelligence, hardware and it's Imperial experience, to their worldwide Empire. Interrogation torture, experiments conducted with their Guineapigs of Internment in Ireland, were copied in Abu Graib and elsewhere. Counter gang experiemnts in Ireland, are used today in the Middle East and further afield. False Flag operations in Ireland, are copied in the US. All of this State sponsored terrorism, forms basis for their terrorist narrative, that is the basis of the abondonment of Human Rights, that enable torture, recently revealed about the CIA. It was all researched in Malaysia, Kenya and Ireland by Kitson. It is still being researched in the form of politcial counter-gangs, post "Peace Process" in all of the island of Ireland and elsewhere, today. Censorship of 'trolls' is an example of it's subtle justification for censorship, coupled with incessant disinformation and propaganda, from the mainstream Corporate Media presstitutes, along with astroturf politcal societies and parties, they bury the truth.

The British started to learn the basics of sticking together and their modern warfare, from the invasion by the Romans, who taught them the value of close military formation, practiced on the rugby playing fields of Eton. It was taken to specialist levels, at their Military Academy at Sandhurst, incorporating doctrines, such as, 'The Art of War' from the ancient Chinese military treatise by Sun Tzu, an ancient military general, strategist and tactician. It is a work of 13 chapters, each devoted to an aspect of warfare. It is the definitive work on military strategy and tactics of it's time. It has been the most influential of China's Seven Military Classics, of the last two thousand years, it remains even today a handbook for many International Corporation business tactics, legal strategy, etc..
The  British Military Academy at Sandhurst, has trained most of the leaders of it's former colonies and Commonwealth of today, from the pool of rich kids of their international establishment, they all feed from the same trough and stick together. 

It's tentacles reach deep into the West Brit, establishment in both parts of Ireland, it extends worldwide from Egypt, to Asia to the still covert W.A.S.P. powerbase in the U.S.. It is sometimes called the lilluminati, Old boy network, Old money, often with direct lines of ancestry, to the same few old  bourgeoisie worldwide. Whatever it is called, it is an inherited reality, from the extended old Royal families. The basics of it's divide an rule are constant, along with the tactics of the 'Art of War'. With modern technology, it evolves in places like GCHQ Cheltenham and in the NSA.We have an ample supply of information of their techniques, from Wikileaks and it's many subsequent whitleblowers. Information is their power, used in Wall Street, City of London, Washington, the Penatagon, International Corporate Media, the Fed, right down to that little uncensored troll in your social media, while their agents subtly censor, what they term 'trolls' like Irish Blog. We better educate ourselves, on how to read between the lines, with regard to incessant disinformation/propaganda and real facts, identify our friends, develop a culture of practical solidarity and Unite.