LETTERBOMB SENT TO VICEROYAL VILLIERS

Wednesday 30 October 2013

 Hi 12°C | Lo 6°C CHANGEBelfast

• News
• Sport
• DebateNI
• Business
• Opinion
• Entertainment
• Woman
• Lifestyle
• Galleries

SEARCH

Home›Local and National››

How on earth did letter bomb addressed to Theresa Villiers get all the way to Stormont?

0Comments

• Email
• Print
• Font Size

 0

 

Share

Police stand at a security gate at Stormont Castle after yesterday's letter bomb

BY JOHN PORTER – 30 OCTOBER 2013

Concerns have been raised over how a letter bomb addressed to the Secretary of State made it all the way to Stormont Castle.

RELATED ARTICLES

Letter bomb: Reminder of threat that the dissidents still pose

ALSO IN THIS SECTION

Loyalists urged to reconsider Christmas shopping protest over Union flag

Cleric recalls pub massacre victims

Why the Consumer Council shouldn't be axed

Sick civil servants 'cost £30m'

The device sparked a major security alert and forced the First Minister from his office.

Dozens of staff at the seat of power in Northern Ireland, including Peter Robinson (right), had to be evacuated on Tuesday afternoon after a suspect parcel was found by workers in the post sorting room.

Army bomb disposal experts were sent to the scene.

They described the device as "viable" and it was taken away for further examination.

Police have said the device was "similar" to those found in the past week which have been blamed on dissident republicans.

Security sources have said the device was small and was packaged in a jiffy-type bag, similar to previous items, and that had it exploded it would have caused serious injury.

Stormont Castle is home to the Office of the First and Deputy First Minister and is also the location for meetings of the Executive.

While Secretary of State Theresa Villiers is not based in the building, her office is in the nearby Stormont House and its post is handled in Stormont Castle.

MLA Paul Girvan, who is Peter Robinson's Private Parliamentary Secretary, told the Belfast Telegraph it was a "concern" that the package managed to make it all the way through the postal system to Stormont.

He said all the mail was delivered to a central reception area in the building and that it would have been close to the First Minister who was working in his office ahead of the alarm being raised on Tuesday morning.

"It's in the same building. There would have been a lot of people in that area," said the DUP representative.

"There should be special attention given to parcels addressed to high-ranking officials like the Secretary of State, especially given the latest spate of these incidents and everyone has to be more vigilant.

"I would expect there to be a serious study going on, by the police, security at Stormont and those involved with the post as to how this managed to happen."

The Department of Finance and Personnel, which runs the Stormont estate, said it was investigating the incident to determine if any further action was required.

Royal Mail, which handles some of the post at Stormont and discovered letter bombs in its sorting offices last week, said it had "strict procedures and protocols" in place to deal with suspect packages.

A spokeswoman said: "We have strict procedures and protocols in place to deal with suspect devices and trained personnel who manage these situations on the ground.

"Our employees are regularly briefed on these protocols which are under constant scrutiny and review. The safety of our people is our number one priority."

Ms Villiers was in London at the time of the alert, meeting with US diplomatRichard Haass, and she condemned the attacks.

First Minister Peter Robinson said that had the bomb gone off the victims would have been postal workers, office staff and civil servants. "Do they really think the Secretary of State opens her post," he asked.

"The attack might get more publicity because of who it was addressed to but the impact would have been on a public servant."

Those behind the terror bid "will not further any aim or objective by their vile and callous deeds", he said.

Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness described the incident as "the offerings of bitter and twisted little minds" and their actions "will further nothing".

Justice Minister David Ford, who happened to be visiting a Royal Mail sorting centre yesterday to praise postal staff for their diligence over recent days in discovering the letter bombs, added his condemnation.

BACKGROUND

The parcel sent to Theresa Villiers is the fourth letter bomb device which has been intercepted in the past week after similar devices were sent to the Chief Constable Matt Baggott, John Burrows, Londonderry's highest-ranking police officer, and the offices of the Public Prosecution Service in Derry.

Those were blamed on dissident republicans and police said yesterday's device was "similar in make-up to the devices found in recent days".

They have appealed for information.

VOMITORIUM VICEROYAL VILLIERS

Rule Britannia For Global Crimes

By Finian CunninghamMay 12, 2013 "Information Clearing House" - It’s an anthem that is usually sung with chest-thumping pride and misty eyes by British imperialists. “Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the waves”. This jingoistic celebration of Britain’s former global conquest may yet degenerate into “Rue Britannia, Britannia rues the waves”.

This is because, as The Guardian newspaper reports this week, the London government has at long last been forced into recognizing compensation payments for as many as 50,000 Kenyan nationals who were victims of torture and other crimes against humanity during that country’s independence struggle in the 1950s. The eventual bill for compensation could run up to tens of millions of pounds.

But the bad news for financially bankrupt Britain does not end there. With this precedent established of compensation for past British imperialist crimes, that now leaves the way open for a global flood of similar claims.

Jingoistic British imperialists may therefore soon rue their often-made reference to Britain ruling the waves and so many countries the world over - at the height of the British Empire some 20 percent of the globe’s land mass was under colonial domination. That’s a lot of people who can claim recompense for past British horrors and deprivation.

If the bill for Britain’s crimes against humanity in Kenya alone runs into tens of millions of pounds, then we can easily multiply that sum manifold if the millions of other victims from across the world who suffered under the British jackboot come forward to claim justice.

The Guardian listed just a handful of additional class-action cases for compensation against the British government. They included the former colonies of Cyprus, Yemen, Swaziland and British Guiana. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg when measuring Britain’s global legacy of crimes and human suffering. Many others would include Britain’s dirty wars and repressive colonial regimes in Bahrain, British Somaliland, Burma, Ghana, Nigeria, Northern Ireland, Oman and Zimbabwe. Even that list is far from complete.

Iran presents a challenging case too. After the British-assisted coup in 1953 that led to the 26-year reign of terror under Shah Pahlavi, tens of thousands of Iranians were subjected to torture by the Western-trained and armed Savak secret police. Iranians therefore have a case for compensation against the British government.

Previously, the British House of Lords decreed arbitrarily that no cases for compensation stemming from before 1954 can be brought to an English court. Fortunately for the British establishment, that ruling excludes millions of more potential litigants from former British India, which gained independence in 1947.

Given the appalling suffering inflicted by the British overlords in India - from starvation, massacres, mass imprisonment and destruction of farming and textile livelihoods to give British exporters a competitive advantage - the resulting claims if filed to the Exchequer would definitely spell good night for Britain’s sputtering economy. Far from ruling the waves, Britannia would sink to a watery grave.

But the real point perhaps is more about principle than money - important though material redress is to victims of injustice. What the case of the Kenyans against the British government is really achieving is to strip bare the truth about Britain’s imperial legacy. British national conceit and history books are replete with double standards and moral relativism. It is too widely and fatuously assumed that Britain’s Empire represented somehow a benevolent contribution to history. British people, and unfortunately English-language academia and media across the world, tend to perceive Britain’s “decolonization” - its retreat from imperial territories - as a magnanimous gesture of granting independence. This delusional notion is best summed up in the Orwellian term “the British Commonwealth of nations”.

With conceited moral duplicity, Britain insists that Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany must pay out compensation to victims of their conquests. But no such obligation pertains to Britain, according to the British rulers. Why not? Only imperial arrogance and a certain sense of victor’s justice stemming from the Second World War are invoked to subjectively justify that contradiction. In the world of objective facts and evidence, Britain is equally liable for redress to its global victims of crimes against humanity.

When Britain set out to destroy the Mau Mau struggle for Kenya’s political independence during the 1950s, the British were not interested in benign, passive “decolonization”. For the British rulers, it was a life-or-death challenge to the entire global system of British Empire and its exploitative excrescence on the world. The same British “siege mentality” manifested ruthlessly against the independence movements in all its colonies.

Up to 300,000 Kenyans were incarcerated in concentration camps during what the British euphemistically called “The Emergency”. That same quaint word - “Emergency” - was used by the British to dissemble their barbarism and brutality in Burma against pro-independence communist guerrilla. During Bahrain and Northern Ireland’s struggle for freedom from Britain’s unlawful dominance, the preferred euphemism for repression was “The Troubles”.

But these semantics aside, the nature of repression meted out by British rulers and their officers was systematically criminal and brutal and comparable to the worst genocidal regimes the world has known.

The Kenyan Mau Mau may have suffered the most, probably owing to a twist of racist depravity among the white British counterinsurgency practitioners. Kenyan prisoners were castrated and roasted over fires by British officers using methods of torture that even classified British records explicitly sanctioned as “Gestapo techniques”.

During the British suppression of the Cypriot insurgency during the 1950s, inmates were routinely tortured by water-boarding sessions in which Kerosene was added to the drowning water. Later, during the 1970s in Northern Ireland’s conflict, Irish prisoners were incarcerated without charge and tortured by hooding, prolonged wall-standing, sleep deprivation, white noise and intimidation with guard dogs, not to mention routine physical beatings.

If such torture and generally repressive regimens sound similar to what has since been uncovered in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay it is because they are wholly consistent. These are the standard operating practices of British military doctrine and that of its close American ally.

The reason why such barbarity continues to be practiced is because of the moral duplicity and propagandized version of history that the Western media and academia instill. Barbarity is something that others perpetrate, not us.

The glacial pace of justice - as shown by the more than six decades’ delay for the Mau Mau victims of British crimes - is reflective of the massive public deception instilled by Western media on behalf of their criminal governments.

However, thanks to the courageous pursuit of justice by many people across the world, this edifice of deception will eventually be broken down. This is imperative as a matter of justice for the millions of victims of British crimes against humanity.

But, in addition, the exposure of British criminality is crucial to deleting the duplicity that serves to give contemporary British and other Western governments a veneer of legitimacy. Britain has no right to pontificate and brow beat Syria, Iran or any other nation about “international obligations”. With the full record of British criminality on display, this is a country that, far from lecturing others, should be made to hang its head in shame and remain silent.

Finian Cunningham, is a prominent expert in international affairs. The author and media commentator was expelled from Bahrain in June 2011 for his critical journalism in which he highlighted human rights violations by the Western-backed regime. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism. He is now based in East Africa where he is writing a book on Bahrain and the Arab Spring. He co-hosts a weekly current affairs programme, Sunday at 3pm GMT on Bandung Radio

Comments (9 DrS· 11 hours ago Many now will seek compensation from the colonial powers. It will bankrupt many and will ensure there is no recovery. Could things be any more bleak than that? It is understandable why many non-Westerners want justice. Can you blame them!? Reply Basic James Rabbit· 11 hours ago The anthem continues: "Britons never, never, never shall be slaves." But it is obviously untrue. "Anyone will tell you it's a prison island, hidden in a cloud for 10,000 years." Jigsaw· 11 hours ago Good article The British Empire was monstrous in it's disregard for the living conditions of most of it's unwilling 'subjects' throughout the world. It was not unique in that as far as empires go but because they controlled the fate of more people so the number of casualties was much greater. One thing perhaps nearly unique about the Brit empire was it's love of settler colonialism, they wanted to eventually transform entirely - new landmasses they claimed... through eradicating the natives and importing white people to create a new nation on the old... They were the most successful in history at doing this - the scarce, marginalised populations of native peoples in N America and Australia are a testament to this. Be thankful they do not 'rule the waves' today as they used to, bad as the yanks are at least there are still Vietnamese people abundant in Vietnam and plenty of Iraqis living a (mostly) unchanged Iraqi way of life today... Although you see in some actions like Starvation sanctions (so beloved of 'liberals') a whiff of the old British Imperial indifference to mass civilian suffering. Reply 1 reply · a Ipse_Dixit· 1 hour ago The Spanish and Portuguese did similar things in Latin America. And in fairness it was the United States that committed genocide rather than Britain. Reply Fitzhenrymac· 11 hours ago Don't forget the indigenous peoples such a Australian Aborigines and Canadian Indians and Inuits. Overall more than 90% of the earth felt the lash of the British Empire including Britain itself. Read more at http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32946.htm Reply voxpopbc· 10 hours ago The English ruling class today are the direct descendants of the Normans who conquered England in 1066. As Vikings (recently arrived in NW France from Scandinavia) they had no empathy with their newly defeated Germanic Anglo-Saxon peasants. Like other ethnic in-groups (Israel?) they emotionally distanced themselves from the majority of their fellows. This led them to readily extend this attitude to foreign lands when they created the British Empire. Sadly, some of their direct descendants also formed the US elite who have continued this imperial nightmare. Reply No JO Jo· 9 hours ago Nazi Germany must pay out --Wrong! England and gang brother France declared war on Germany 1938 and fire bombed several German cities. Why? Because Germany invaded Poland. Germany had a good right to do it--Polish Jews were being abused and Unlce USA Scam was funding the Nazi government to send Polish Jews into Palestine--record 175,000. And what was Eng's terror business to go after Germany? Same as USA--get control of all of Europe. It did work-NATO and millions more Jews to Palestine Reply ian· 9 hours ago then the people can after the french for their atrocities in northern africa and while they consider that go after the italians for their brutal treatment of the libyians but tell me how can you get anyone in the US to front any tribunal when they don't recognise any international laws Reply BP Storm· 8 hours ago The British have invaded all but 20 or so nations on Earth. That says something right there. Just ask a native Tasmainian what they think of Britain. That's a joke son, you can't ask a native Tasmainian what they think of Britain, because Britain killed them all. Marched women and children(not to mention the men) over cliffs into the Sea. The Brits will tell you that they are civilized though. Not really though, England is not Civilized. The English are just a bunch of Dandies. Like that Prime Minister they have now. The Irish called the Union Jack(and still do to this day) the Butcher's Apron. They have invaded Afghanistan at least 5 times since 1839. And they have gotten their butts kicked out everytime. They pulled out a few weeks ago leaving The Americans and NATO holding the bag, because they know what Afghanistan becomes when conquerers begin to loose power, as will happen as the US pulls out. Prince Harry in his brilliance called the Afghans a bunch of Towel Heads a few years ago, easy to see the racism involved. The only important thing to ever come out of Britain were some Rock'n'Roll bands. Everything else was crime laden.