Showing posts with label tout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tout. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

TOUT & RECONCILIATION PROCESS


A Nation of Snitches

By Chris Hedges

 

  A Transportation Security Administration sign at Los Angeles’ main rail terminal, Union Station, urges that suspicious activities be reported to authorities. It declares, “If You See Something Say Something.” (AP / Damian Dovarganes)
May 11, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "Truthdig" - A totalitarian state is only as strong as its informants. And the United States has a lot of them. They read our emails. They listen to, download and store our phone calls. They photograph us on street corners, on subway platforms, in stores, on highways and in public and private buildings. They track us through our electronic devices. They infiltrate our organizations. They entice and facilitate “acts of terrorism” by Muslims, radical environmentalists, activists and Black Bloc anarchists, framing these hapless dissidents and sending them off to prison for years. They have amassed detailed profiles of our habits, our tastes, our peculiar proclivities, our medical and financial records, our sexual orientations, our employment histories, our shopping habits and our criminal records. They store this information in government computers. It sits there, waiting like a time bomb, for the moment when the state decides to criminalize us.
Totalitarian states record even the most banal of our activities so that when it comes time to lock us up they can invest these activities with subversive or criminal intent. And citizens who know, because of the courage of Edward Snowden, that they are being watched but naively believe they “have done nothing wrong” do not grasp this dark and terrifying logic.
Tyranny is always welded together by subterranean networks of informants. These informants keep a populace in a state of fear. They perpetuate constant anxiety and enforce isolation through distrust. The state uses wholesale surveillance and spying to break down trust and deny us the privacy to think and speak freely.
A state security and surveillance apparatus, at the same time, conditions all citizens to become informants. In airports and train, subway and bus stations the recruitment campaign is relentless. We are fed lurid government videos and other messages warning us to be vigilant and report anything suspicious. The videos, on endless loops broadcast through mounted television screens, have the prerequisite ominous music, the shady-looking criminal types, the alert citizen calling the authorities and in some cases the apprehended evildoer being led away in handcuffs. The message to be hypervigilant and help the state ferret out dangerous internal enemies is at the same time disseminated throughout government agencies, the mass media, the press and the entertainment industry. 
“If you see something say something,” goes the chorus.
In any Amtrak station, waiting passengers are told to tell authorities—some of whom often can be found walking among us with dogs—about anyone who “looks like they are in an unauthorized area,” who is “loitering, staring or watching employees and customers,” who is “expressing an unusual level of interest in operations, equipment, and personnel,” who is “dressed inappropriately for the weather conditions, such as a bulky coat in summer,” who “is acting extremely nervous or anxious,” who is “restricting an individual’s freedom of movement” or who is “being coached on what to say to law enforcement or immigration officials.”
What is especially disturbing about this constant call to become a citizen informant is that it directs our eyes away from what we should see—the death of our democracy, the growing presence and omnipotence of the police state, and the evisceration, in the name of our security, of our most basic civil liberties.
Manufactured fear engenders self-doubt. It makes us, often unconsciously, conform in our outward and inward behavior. It conditions us to relate to those around us with suspicion. It destroys the possibility of organizing, community and dissent. We have built what Robert Gellately calls a “culture of denunciation.”
Snitches in prisons, the quintessential totalitarian system, are the glue that allows prison authorities to maintain control and keep prisoners divided and weak. Snitches also populate the courts, where the police make secret deals to drop or mitigate charges against them in exchange for their selling out individuals targeted by the state. Our prisons are filled with people serving long sentences based on false statements that informants provided in exchange for leniency.
There are no rules in this dirty game. Police, like prison officials, can offer snitches deals that lack judicial oversight or control. (Deals sometimes involve something as trivial as allowing a prisoner access to food like cheeseburgers.) Snitches allow the state to skirt what is left of our legal protections. Snitches can obtain information for the authorities and do not have to give their targets a Miranda warning. And because of the desperation of most who are recruited to snitch, informants will do almost anything asked of them by authorities.
Just as infected as the prisons and the courts are poor neighborhoods, which abound with snitches, many of them low-level drug dealers allowed to sell on the streets in exchange for information. And from there our culture of snitches spirals upward into the headquarters of the National Security Agency, Homeland Security and the FBI.
Systems of police and military authority are ruthless when their own, such as Edward Snowden or Chelsea Manning, become informants on behalf of the common good. The power structure imposes walls of silence and harsh forms of retribution within its ranks in an effort to make sure no one speaks. Power understands that once it is divided, once those inside its walls become snitches, it becomes as weak and vulnerable as those it subjugates.
We will not be able to reclaim our democracy and free ourselves from tyranny until the informants and the vast networks that sustain them are banished. As long as we are watched 24 hours a day we cannot use the word “liberty.” This is the relationship of a master and a slave. Any prisoner understands this.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his masterpiece “The Gulag Archipelago,” which chronicles his time in Josef Stalin’s gulags and is a brilliant reflection of the nature of oppression and tyranny, describes a moment when an influx of western Ukrainians who had been soldiers during World War II arrived at his camp, at Ekibastuz. The Ukrainians, he wrote, “were horrified by the apathy and slavery they saw, and reached for their knives.” They began to murder the informants.
Solzhenitsyn continued:
“Kill the stoolie!” That was it, the vital link! A knife in the heart of the stoolie! Make knives and cut the stoolie’s throats—that was it!
Now as I write this chapter, rows of humane books frown down at me from the walls, the tarnished gilt on their well-worn spines glinting reproachfully like stars through the cloud. Nothing in the world should be sought through violence! By taking up the sword, the knife, the rifle, we quickly put ourselves on the level of tormentors and persecutors. And there will be no end to it. …
There will be no end. … Here, at my desk, in a warm place, I agree completely.
If you ever get twenty-five years for nothing, if you find yourself wearing four number patches on your clothes, holding your hands permanently behind your back, submitting to searches morning and evening, working until you are utterly exhausted, dragged into the cooler whenever someone denounces you, trodden deeper and deeper into the ground—from the hole you’re in, the fine words of the great humanists will sound like the chatter of the well-fed and free.
There will be no end of it! ... But will there be a beginning? Will there be a ray of hope in our lives or not?
The oppressed at least concluded that evil cannot be cast out by good.
The eradication of some snitches and intimidation of others transformed the camp. It was, Solzhenitsyn admits, an imperfect justice since there was no “documentary confirmation that a man was an informer.” But, he noted, even this “improperly constituted, illegal, and invisible court was much more acute in its judgments, much less often mistaken, than any of the tribunals, panels of three, courts-martial, or Special Boards with which we are familiar.”
“Of the five thousand men about a dozen were killed, but with every stroke of the knife more and more of the clinging, twining tentacles fell away,” he wrote. “A remarkable fresh breeze was blowing! On the surface we were prisoners living in a camp just as before, but in reality we had become free—free because for the very first time in our lives we had started saying openly and aloud all that we thought! No one who has not experienced this transition can imagine what it is like!
And the informers … stopped informing.”
The camp bosses, he wrote “were suddenly blind and deaf. To all appearances, the tubby major, his equally tubby second in command, Captain Prokofiev, and all the wardens walked freely about the camp, where nothing threatened them; moved among us, watched us—and yet saw nothing! Because a man in uniform sees and hears nothing without stoolies.”
The system of internal control in the camp broke down. Prisoners no longer would serve as foremen on work details. Prisoners organized their own self-governing council. Guards began to move about the camp in fear and no longer treated prisoners like cattle. Pilfering and theft among prisoners stopped. “The old camp mentality—you die first, I’ll wait a bit; there is no justice so forget it; that’s the way it was, and that’s the way it will be—also began to disappear.”
Solzhenitsyn concluded this chapter, “Behind the Wire the Ground Is Burning,” in Volume 3 of his book, with this reflection.
Purged of human filth, delivered from spies and eavesdroppers we looked about and saw, wide-eyed that … we were thousands! That we were … politicals!That we could resist!
We had chosen well; the chain would snap if we tugged at this link—the stoolies, the talebearers and traitors! Our own kind had made our lives impossible. As on some ancient sacrificial altar, their blood had been shed that we might be freed from the curse that hung over us.
The revolution was gathering strength. The wind that seemed to have subsided had sprung up again in a hurricane to fill our eager lungs.
Later in the book Solzhenitsyn would write, “Our little island had experienced an earthquake—and ceased to belong to the Archipelago.” 
Freedom demands the destruction of the security and surveillance organs and the disempowering of the millions of informants who work for the state. This is not a call to murder our own stoolies—although some of the 2.3 million prisoners in cages in America’s own gulags would perhaps rightly accuse me of writing this from a position of privilege and comfort and not understanding the brutal dynamics of oppression – but instead to accept that unless these informants on the streets, in the prisons and manning our massive, government data-collection centers are disarmed we will never achieve liberty. I do not have quick and simple suggestions for how this is to be accomplished. But I know it must.

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

WHO IS THE TOUT ?

Who is the Tout ?





Who is the Tout ?

informer  singular

A person whom the government pay to snitch on people. Sometimes they work as double agents informing drug houses of a comming raid.

I got put in a cell with an informer.


by Photomagic3000 March 24, 2006

Etymology[edit]


braith (to betray) +‎ -adóir

Noun[edit]

brathadóir m (genitive brathadóranominative
 plural brathadóirí)

  1. betrayer
  2. spyinformer

Declension[edit]

Derived terms[edit]

Mutation[edit]

Irish mutation
RadicalLenitionEclipsis
brathadóirbhrathadóirmbrathadóir
Note: Some of these forms may be hypothetical. Not every
possible mutated form of every word actually occurs

Words related to informer:

information snitch informant inform informal info internet knowledge rat informative wikipedia informed google facebook data search gossip tmi technology narc



tout
someone who betrays a confidence.
to squeal, to tell tales, to inform the police of illegal activites.
touts out!
fucking bastard touted on me and i got 5 years!
by anger management June 05, 2003


tout


slang from the occupied 6 counties of
the north of ireland. a tout is a grass
a stool pigeon, one who sells out their
neighbours for 10 quid.
justice for a tout is swift.




"I have sworn upon the Altar of Godeternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson

InFormer Ministry is a volunteer, non-sectarian religious order. It was established to educate the public about dangerous cults, and to assist ex-members, their families and those recovering from involvement with fanatical groups. We give guidance and support to individuals attempting to integrate back into society after having been divorced from reality as a result of participation in such groups.
We seek ...... to steer people away from involvement in cults and dangerous groups through education and informed guidance.
... to help individuals who have been victimized by cults begin to re-establish a normal, healthy, balanced life for themslves..
... to provide common-sense, practical guidance for those who have been segregated from society in cults.
... to abstain from any attempt to convert or coerce the acceptance of dogma.
... to encourage the logical exploration of diverse ideas so those affected by cults can come to their own conclusions.
... to help individuals regain the ability to reason for themselves. 

We believe ...
... that there is goodness and worth in the world outside the cult and one should try to better the real world rather than alienating oneself from it.
... that finding one's own sense of direction and fit in the real world is part of recovering from a cult.
... that the process of redeeming one's mind and soul after having given over control to a false prophet, a harmful ideology or a malicious leader requires some exceptionally thorough soul-searching, a bit of benevolent guidance and perhaps even God's mercy to be successful.

_______________
_____________
_______________
"You who build these altars now,To sacrifice these children,
You must not do it anymore.
A scheme is not a vision ..."

- Leonard Cohen 



Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is Dennis Erlich.
I consider myself a man of neither great scholarship nor wisdom. With the possible exception of common sense gained by repeatedly surviving my own life-destructive mistakes, I claim to no particular qualifications whatsoever. But in the course of time I have come to believe my God-given, religious calling is to help those affected by cults in any way I can.
I created the inFormer Ministry to provide insight into the workings of fanaticism and where possible mitigate its effects on victimized followers and their families. It is difficult for anyone who hasn't "been there and done that" to understand that ordinary people can be transformed into unthinking instruments of power and destruction by submitting themselves to certain types of leaders, organizations and ideologies. Those who have been in cults have a different and perhaps even harder understanding to achieve: how it was done to them - what made them vulnerable to fanaticism in the first place.
The ministry has existed since the mid-80's when I began trying to understand how people were affected by cultic encounters, and to assist with counseling, writing and publishing public service material about cults. In 1990 others joined in the ministry's work contributing written articles, musical collaborations, recovery support and help to distribute the ministry's newsletter. In 1997 we registered in California as inFormer Ministry: a religious/educational corporation. The name "inFormer" was suggested by one the newsletter's staff writers in the early '90s. It signified in our minds that we formerly were "in" and now are out.
As to how many people have been helped by the ministry's outreach, publications, events and personal counseling ... you'd have to ask around. I don't think the number will be in the millions ... but who knows? I've been told that on the internet more than one person can be helped at the same time. This is our hope and my personal prayer.
Assisting with counseling, recordings, publications, collaborations, public events, and in other countless ways, the ministry has been blessed with board members and friends for whom I am eternally grateful. Without their care it's likely neither the ministry nor I would have survived to do this work.
This website is intended to provide insight into cults. If you are looking for information on a specific one, enter the name of the group in the google search box, in quotes (like "people's temple") and click the search button.
If you want to see what has been posted about that group to a public discussion on the subject (called a Usenet Newsgroup), click here and type in the name. If you want to read postings to a newsgroup relating to cult recovery, click here.
In my humble opinion the most sensible way of dealing with a cult is to read as much as you can from what is available on the subject. Read not only what the scholars, the therapists, and the reformers have to say about cults. You should also read the postings from members and ex-members of that group on the public Usenet Newsgroups and ex-member message boards. If there are likely to be newspaper articles, you can probably track them down at your with the help of the librarian at your local library, or find them somewhere on the internet using a search engine like the one to the left.
In the meantime, here's a partial booklist about cults and high-demand groups to get you started.
But by all means remain calm. Don't allow yourself to become frantic or carried away in some desparate crusade. Try to stay composed and methodical. In this way you'll be able to guide yourself, your family or a friend away from dangerous groups and ideologies with your loving care and informed concern. That is my prayer for you.
May God bless you and keep your loved ones safe.
Sincerely,
Rev. Dennis L. Erlich
__________
"Once there was a little girl
Used to wonder what she'd be
Went out into the big wide world
Now she's just a memory"

- Mark Knopfler

Cults: A Search for Answers
By Rev. Dennis Erlich
(first published in Magazine of the Midlands, 1984)
Most people at one time or another in passing from infancy to old age, will seek to answer basic questions about life like "Why am I here?," "Why aren't things better in the world?" and "What, if anything can I do about it?"
These questions may not be put into words, but I believe they are examined nonetheless.
Everyday social experiences may not be sufficient to provide some with satisfactory answers to these questions. Most will hopefully look for the answer in study and education; in travel or alternative lifestyles. Others may turn to drugs to chemically block out their confusion. Many eventually turn to religion for the answers to these questions.
For some of those who turn to religion, the mainstream religions will not provide satisfactory answers. So they may turn instead to practices with which they are less familiar, in the hope that unfamiliar ideas might satisfy their needs.
Traditionally the family, through instruction and example, has provided acceptable answers to questions about the purpose and meaning of life. With the breakdown of the family in most segments of modern society, the duties and responsibilities of such instruction are increasingly left to the media, the state, or to chance.
A great many people are looking for answers to their confusion and pain. These are the very ones cults attract.
Cult Recruitment
Cults recruit converts in an interesting and effective way. Their newest members, eager to pass on newfound truths, are sent out to contact prospective members, find a way to interest them in the cult and direct them into the cult's premises.
The cult member, to be faithful to the cult, must show the outsider the error in his ideas or behavior. This is not particularly difficult if the targeted recruit is a young person who is already somewhat confused or alienated. The promise that the cult's practices will bring relief from some private suffering is usually enough to create interest in such vulnerable young people.
If the cult member is unsuccessful in getting the targeted person interested or even physically herding the outsider into the organization, he simply looks for another potential convert to contact and convince. Almost every cult has some sort of instruction and training in its own particular method of getting outsiders interested enough to explore the cult or enter its premises.
Once the newly contacted person enters the environment that the cult controls, an indoctrination is choreographed by the members within, in order to ensure the recruit is induced or compelled to go along with the cult's program at all points.
The outsider is treated with kindness, interest, care and respect by his newfound friends to such a degree that, no matter how lost and hopeless he felt before, he finally feels at home. The group shows what seems to be genuine concern for the things that trouble him, and they tell him that they, and they alone, can truly help him.
Thus the newcomer becomes convinced that he is dealing with a group of people with a higher level of integrity and purpose than those with whom he has been in contact outside the cult. He is made to feel that he could fit in with and some day be like these wonderful, caring people. He is told at the very least, they can help him overcome his weakness and set him on a path toward whatever he is seeking.
Once the convert signs on to the group's program he submits his locus of control over to the group. From that point on, mild social pressure applied within the closed environment of the cult is usually enough to enforce "proper" behavior and opinion in the person, or to modify them back to the group's norm.
Secure in his ready-made support network, the newcomer has found answers to the questions about life that so troubled him earlier, and he feels relieved of the feelings of confusion and hopelessness. He is sure of himself and indeed eager to guide others, in their ignorance, toward "The Truth."
Pressure from the "Outside"
New converts usually first try to enlighten their family and friends. The responses they get to espousing a strange new doctrine are often less than enthusiastic, and at times openly hostile. This immediate rejection can unfortunately drive the newly-converted cultist further away from society and into the safety of the cult.
Cult members consider themselves and their fellow crusaders to be very different from the rest of society. They believe their group is the one who holds The Truth (and therefore the salvation) for the rest of mankind. Outsiders are unenlightened and not suitable as close friends unless delivered from ignorance.
Real communication between cult members and outsiders is problematic for those in a cult. They generally will substitute pre-rehearsed rhetoric, designed to "enlighten" the outsider, for any critical discussion. Failing to convert or pacify criticism, they may force a confrontation with an ultimatum designed to justify a rift and further separation. At times It can appear hopeless using legal means, to reason with a cult member about his participation in the cult.
It can be a very frustrating and painful situation for the family and close friends of the new convert.
Desperation
Families in desperate concern for their loved ones have in the past resorted to the dangerous and sometimes illegal practice of forcible deprogramming.
In my opinion this thoroughly discredited procedure was just another version of what was done to the person in the cult. A new set of ideas was forcibly installed into the person's mind which he had to accept in order to be free. In forcible deprogramming the person was allowed to be free of the deprogrammer's control once he had discarded the cult's ideas and accepted the deprogrammer's. The former cult member once again lost his right and ability to think. It can amount to coercion and brainwashing. This was the factor in deprogramming which lead to criminal charges and lawsuits by grown children against their parents.
Cults react to practices like these by becoming more protective of their members and exerting even more control over communication in and out. Cult leaders justify further separating their members from society by citing acts of forcible deprogramming as serious violations of the member's right of religious freedom.
Under these circumstances the conditions for the people still in a cult worsen. They are shown outsiders actually intend to violate their rights. This situation causes members in such groups to shun all real contact with the rest of society.

Out from under the "ether"
In time the cult member will probably see flaws in the policies and the practices of the cult and in its leaders. As the person moves up in the formal hierarchy of the organization he will probably become more cynical and willing to ignore the visible contradictions between the cult's practices and its stated aims. At some point he may come to believe that for the good of the greater purpose, such contradictions should be ignored or tolerated without comment.
Having been so sure of the rightness of his decision to dedicate himself to the cult in the first place, the person will be hesitant to grant much importance to anything that might indicate he may have made a huge mistake. All the hard work he put into the cult, and all the anguish he caused to others with his newfound truth combine to make him less inclined to re-examine his decision to join the cult in the first place.
Ultimately, when the pressure of reality becomes too great, the cultist will reach out to those things that have been stable and true for him all his life: the love and care of his family and friends, and the protection this great country provides for the right to think as one wishes.
If the person's contact with the cult has been more than casual interest, after he returns to society it may take him a quite a while to sort out the truth about the cult and his involvement in it. Those who love and care for the former cult member should allow him to sort out the truth regarding his involvement in the cult on his own, while getting on with his life. It generally takes longer still for him to adjust to living in society and to figure out what his part in it should be. This period of readjustment after leaving a cult can take years and is often painful and upsetting. The person may feel purposeless, confused and unsure once again about his ability to cope with real life outside the cult.
Much more effort should go into finding ways to alleviate the suffering of former members or their families. But there a number of books on the subject of cult recovery in this booklist. And here is an excellent article on cult recovery.
Society's main concern has not been for the victims of cults, but rather for the threat fanatical cults may pose to the social structure.
Good Luck.
Dennis