Showing posts with label Irish Independent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Irish Independent. Show all posts

Friday, 27 March 2015

PEDOPHILES RULE UK & IRELAND





Gerry Adams, his father, his brother and his Party


News has been coming out almost every month, on child rape by Liam Adams, Gerry’s brother, along with more stories of abuse by his father subjecting their children to rape, along with many members of their party. Adams hinself gave an interview on RTE and claimed, that his own father was also a child abuser. While Gerry Adams claimed that he didn’t know if he was abused or not. How can he not know, if he was abused or not? Another disgusting ploy, to try and save Sinn Fein, with numerous scories of similar child rapes. All prime meat for the British Intelliigence Services, in their British Dirty War in ireland


Gerry Adams knew about these rapes, decades ago but allowed his brother to continue to work with children. He allowed and supported his brother to continue his Sinn Fein career in Dundalk. The Priest Fr Troy used his influence within the Catholic Church, to try and force victims of Sinn fein rape to drop charges and to protect parties' many pedophiles. Gerry Adams claimed he didn’t know where his brother was at the time, despite keeping in contact with him. Sinn Fein should have let their communities in Dundalk and Belfast know, there was another Adams' pedophile living in their midst, to protect the children.


British forces were not interested in prosecuting the Adams family or their circle of pedophile friends just like the BBC, with their pedohile ring .Neither were they interested  in getting justice or protecting the defenceless children, when these crimes were first reported to them. Why did they not arrest Liam Adams? Why did they not question him? Why was he and his pedophile ring, allowed to continue working with children? Did they turn Liam Adams? 
Did they turn his father? Did they turn his brother?  Did they turn most of Sinn fein in Belfast? Did they turn most of Sinn fein in Ireland? Did they use this information, to recruit informers all over Ireland? Unfortunately for legal reason, we cannot name all of these people, but you don't have to be particulary bright, to get the complete picture, it's politcal consequence for ireland and it's devastating effect on the island.

To make matters even worse, after a mjor state Inquiry in Ireland, which just a few years ago, found that Child Rape was 'SYSTEMIC' in the country. The Government also wants to cover it all up again. SYSTEMIC CHILD RAPE! Think about those three words for a moment and their consequence that ran into tens of thousands over many years. What the hell is wrong with the Women and men of Ireland, who stand idly by and permit this. What the hell is wrong with over a quarter of the electorate, that is prepared to elect a party to Government, that pro-actively engages, in enabling Child Rape and executing Child Rape. Its systemic prevalance among the Irish politcialestablishment, leaves Ireland wide open to control by both foreign Corporations and Governments. How sick is this? It is difficult to imagine anything  more outrageous, until you read yesterday's Irish Independet, just a few short years, after the infamous Inquiry.



Survivors outraged at plan to seal abuse reports for 75 years


23/03/2015 | 02:30
Education Minister Jan O'SullivanOPEN GALLERY 1Education Minister Jan O'Sullivan

Surviviors of institutional abuse have expressed outrage over Government plans to seal all major industrial school and orphanage investigation records for 75 years.

SHARE

The move, which also allows for the possible destruction of documents, must now be ratified by the Dáil in a bill which will be brought forward by Education Minister Jan O'Sullivan.

The Irish Independent has learned that the bill has been approved by Cabinet for drafting.

The Retention of Records Bill 2015 will provide for the strict and confidential sealing of documents from the Commission into Child Abuse, the Residential Institutions Redress Board and the Residential Institutions Review Committee.

Tom Cronin of Irish Survivors of Institutional Abuse International said abuse survivors were "shocked and horrified" that the records would be sealed for so long.

"I can understand that these documents are sensitive and that they might need to be sealed for a period of years.

"But why seal them for 75 years? Why not seal them for five or 10 years? By the time they can be accessed again, everyone associated with this most shameful period of Irish history will be long dead. The whole thing won't be anything more than a footnote in history by 2090," he said.

Mr Cronin also expressed concern that, by sealing the documents, the Government may unwittingly frustrate any potential future legal action by abuse survivors.

"Who knows what new evidence or material might arise in the future? That new evidence might prove worthless because the vital supporting documentation will be locked away in a vault for 75 years."

Ms O'Sullivan has defended the Government's position, saying the records are "highly sensitive and contain the personal stories of victims of institutional child abuse".

"I believe that it is important that these records are not destroyed, both to ensure that future generations will understand what happened and out of respect to the victims who came forward," she said.

"By sealing the records for 75 years and ensuring appropriate safeguards on the release of the records thereafter, we are in a position to preserve these sensitive records."

Maeve Lewis, director of charity One In Four, said the bill represented a difficult compromise between those who wanted the records kept as a vital part of Irish history and those who demanded all documentation be destroyed on confidentiality grounds.

"It is a compromise. Our position was that these records had to be preserved as a vital part of Irish history. In fact, we felt that the destruction of these documents would be a crime," she said.

The Government plan is for all documents from the various abuse probes to be lodged with the National Archives.


COMMISSION INTO CHILD ABUSE

Sometimes known as the Ryan Report or the Laffoy Commission after the judges who headed the lengthy probe, the investigation ran for 10 years, from 1999 to 2009. It inquired into the abuse of children in a range of different Irish institutions.

It examined all forms of abuse dating from 1936 and amongst its most shocking findings was the treatment meted out to children in industrial schools operated by Church bodies with the support of the State.

These ranged from rapes, beatings and the starvation of children, to youngsters being hired out as cheap labour. The abuse was described as "endemic" and was said to be "the most shameful episode in the history of the Irish State".

The Residential Institutions Redress Board (RIRB) was set up in 2002 to compensate those who were abused as children in various State and Church institutions since 1936.

By the end of 2013, the RIRB had dealt with 16,620 applications for compensation. The total awards made amounted to €944.1m. The average award was €62,530.

Irish Independent

THIS BLOG IS SLOWED BY INTRANETS

PLEASE SHARE

Friday, 10 August 2012

MEDIA FREE MARIAN PRICE END INTERNMENT WITHOUT TRIAL




 Rotate photo
  View full size
Olympics London2012 No Gold Host Not so Great Britain & North Korea     http://brev.is/Cxa3
Views 30,394

10 days ago
Olympics London2012 Great Britain & North Korea http://brev.is/Cxa3

The 12th, Marian Price, gay issues... George Galloway talks tough in Belfast


By Jane Hardy
Thursday, 9 August 2012
George Galloway
George Galloway
MP George Galloway has said that dissident republican Marian Price should be freed.
The politician was speaking last night at the Belfast Feile.
He told the West Belfast Talks Back session: “The courts freed Marian Price so she should be freed”, adding he did not support her “political line” and if she reoffended she should be charged and brought before the courts.
Mr Galloway then revealed he had just spoken to the 58-year-old prisoner, convicted of bombing the Old Bailey, while talking to her husband Jerry McGlinchey.
“I have just spoken to her on the phone for the first time and she's not a well woman,” he said. “For all the damning with faint praise, and Ruth Dudley Edwards' reference to her ‘remarkable recovery’ (after Price's 1973 hunger strike), the courts decreed she should be released and it's time to free Marian Price.”
Alongside Mr Galloway on the panel was a rainbow coalition of opinion-makers and politicians: DUP MP Gregory Campbell, author Ruth Dudley Edwards and Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly.
The first half of the debate discussed, without resolving, Syria and the Middle East question.
Opinion divided pretty much along sectarian lines, with Galloway and Kelly regarding Western inaction on Syria as hypocrisy and part of a ploy to destabilise Iran.
Gregory Campbell and Ruth Dudley Edwards, in different ways, pointed out the complexity of the situation and the fact that the situation after any Western intervention might not look better than before.
After broadening talk out to Israel and Palestine, Ms Edwards caused some hissing in the audience by suggesting the Feile might introduce an Israeli representative to “hear the other side”.
It then moved on to gay issues which led to some agonising from Mr Campbell, although his statement of concern that marriage between a man and a woman could be undermined by acceptance of the “lifestyle” of the lesbian and gay community received surprising support from George Galloway.
The Respect MP for West Bradford caused amusement by saying you couldn't promote homosexuality — “you either are or you aren't” — and adding that attendance at any number of Pride marches would not change his orientation.
The debate turned to recent trouble over July 12, with a discussion over whether the Orange Order should be banned following a band's misbehaviour and the singing of ‘The Famine Song’ outside a Catholic church.
Discussion was fierce, and intensified later between Messrs Campbell and Kelly over whether the former would ever shake hands with the latter.
You can only hope that these exchanges are in some way cathartic.


Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/the-12th-marian-price-gay-issues-george-galloway-talks-tough-in-belfast-16195641.html#ixzz23AQvzGTb



Reply to Owen Paterson on Marian Price - 

 Irish Independent  Wednesday, August 8, 2012


Sandy Boyer in a letter takes the North of Ireland's political boss to task over hisGuardian letter which fed disinformation on Marian Price

Owen Paterson, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, has written a letter to the editor of The Guardian (London) attempting to justify imprisoning Marian Price. I’ve included his letter below.

Paterson makes two essential points:
  • That Marian Price was released on “license”, parole in American terms, which he had the right to revoke.
  • That he does not have the legal right to release her because it can only be done by the Parole Commission.

Unfortunately for Mr. Paterson, neither is true.

He claims she received a royal pardon “the Royal Prerogative of Mercy” for a 20 year sentence related to the Old Bailey bombing but was on license for a life term for the same bombing.

If so, this would have been a strange and meaningless order. Granting a pardon for a 20 year sentence while simultaneously releasing someone on license from a life sentence would have achieved absolutely nothing.

If Mr. Paterson seriously believes the royal pardon doesn’t apply to Marian Price’s life sentence, all he has to do is produce it. Instead he states that the only copy of the pardon has been lost or shredded. Marian Price’s solicitor, Peter Corrigan, says that this is the only time in the entire history of the Royal Prerogative of Mercy that a pardon has gone missing.

Paterson also states that he can’t release Marian Price because “It would be outrageous for any secretary of state to do anything other than adhere strictly to the law.”

But the Life Sentences (NI) Order 2001 proclaimed by “Her Majesty” provides explicitly that “The Secretary of State may at any time release a life prisoner on licence if he is satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist which justify the prisoner’s release on compassionate grounds.”

There could hardly be more “compassionate grounds” for releasing Marian Price. United Nations doctors who examined her in July reported she was “unable to comprehend the allegations being made against her to sufficient degree to inform her defence” and that “she would be unable to follow the evidence in her own hearing as she lacks the ability to attend to detailed evidence”. She is presently hospitalized with pneumonia.

If Owen Paterson is serious about enforcing British law, he should release Marian Price immediately.

Sandy Boyer
Free Marian Price Campaign, US


Owen Paterson letter to The Guardian

You refer in your editorial (Northern Ireland: keep focused, 28 July) to the case of Marian McGlinchey (nee Price). I should be grateful for the opportunity to set out the facts.

Marian McGlinchey received two life sentences in 1973 for her part in the Old Bailey bombing. She was subsequently released on licence in 1980. At the same time she was granted the royal prerogative of mercy (RPM) in respect of a separate conviction which carried a 20-year fixed term sentence. The RPM did not cover her life sentences.

All life sentence prisoners remain on licence for life. They can be recalled at any time if they breach the conditions of their licence or pose a risk of serious harm to the public. A similar system was endorsed by the previous government in the legislation to give effect to the part of the Belfast Agreement that dealt with the early release of prisoners.

Before revoking a prisoner's licence under the Life Sentences (Northern Ireland) Order 2001, however, the secretary of state must first seek a recommendation from the wholly independent parole commissioners. This is what I did in the case of Marian McGlinchey; their recommendation was that she was in breach of her life licence. Consistent with my overriding responsibility in Northern Ireland for public safety, and in accordance with the law, she was returned to prison.

The independent parole commissioners are now reviewing the case in full. If they are satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the protection of the public that the prisoner should be confined, then they may direct the prisoner's release. The prisoner has full legal representation and can challenge the case made against her; Marian McGlinchey has yet to do this. The decision of the parole commissioners is final and cannot be overruled by the secretary of state.

It would be outrageous for any secretary of state to do anything other than adhere strictly to the law. Yet the clear inference in your editorial is that I should discard due process and interfere politically in this case. That would fatally undermine the rule of law in Northern Ireland. That is not something I am prepared to do.

Owen Paterson MP

Secretary of state for Northern Ireland

8 comments:

marty 10:08 AM, August 08, 2012
LYING BASTARD;Patterson that is..
AM 8:48 AM, August 09, 2012
Sandy,

good job. They are spinning this like the NIO spin of old. They used to tell the world prisoners never got beaten! This discourse needs challenged at every turn
Kilsally 12:09 PM, August 09, 2012
She should probably have thought of that when she started holding speeches for masked gunmen advocating shooting catholic police officers.
AM 1:30 PM, August 09, 2012
Kilsally,

we had three from you of the same thing. Nothing goes up automatically so somebody needs to be online here before you can get your comment posted.

But to your point. People should not be in prison for what they thought or didn't think. What she should have thought - no matter how valid you think your point to be - is immaterial to the fact that she is being imporisoned without trial and the British government is dissembling to cover that up.

The same logic argued here by Sandy would be applied if a loyalist was in the position that Marian Price finds herself.
eireannach 1:49 PM, August 09, 2012
A Royal perogative of Mercy is a State document and as such it's unlikely it was shredded as previously stated. As it's a State document it should be now in the public domain under the Freedom of Information Act, so over to you Mr. Paterson, to shred a State document is illegal.
marty 2:40 PM, August 09, 2012
eireannach.when those who make the law break the law then there is no law!whats the odds that Patterson or anyone else will be charged with destruction of government property..no mission..
Simon 2:42 PM, August 09, 2012
It is similar to Danny Morrison's arrest years ago for having in his possession a statement from the IRA. His argument was he didn't write it in fact since it was in pen it could have been copied from the original. He also explained that it could have easily been a hand written copy of a loyalist statement.

I know it does not contain the same key facts but maybe there is some legal ruling from Danny's case which could apply in this instance?
christopher conley, jr. 5:56 PM, August 09, 2012
Mr. Paterson: "It would be outrageous for any secretary of state to do anything other than adhere strictly to the law"

So he agrees that his interference in the court's proceedings regarding Martin Corey is "outrageous" ?