Wednesday, 16 July 2014

ORANGE ORDER MI5 BOY BROTHEL












Dark secrets: Kincora Boys' Home in east Belfast, where children were abused for years

A UK-wide inquiry into child sex abuse will lack credibility unless it examines allegations surrounding Kincora Boys' Home, it has been claimed.

Clint Massey, who waived his right to anonymity to speak about how he was abused, said: "I strongly believe there's a lot more to come out."
Amnesty's Northern Ireland director Patrick Corrigan also warned that any inquiry must examine Kincora.




William McGrath was one of three staff members jailed in 1981 for abusing boys at Kincora
"For an inquiry to take place into child sexual abuse and potential cover-ups by the establishment and not include Kincora would mean that that inquiry lacks credibility," he said.
Supporting the calls, East Belfast DUP MLA Robin Newton said the perpetrators behind Kincora's grim past must be held accountable.
"The scandal of the Kincora Boys' Home continues to taint east Belfast and those who suffered abuse within its walls need justice," he said.
The Kincora scandal emerged in January 1980. Three senior staff members – William McGrath, Joseph Mains and William Semple – were jailed in 1981 for the abuse.
However, there have been persistent allegations of a mass cover-up by the secret service, which was rumoured to be protecting high-ranking paedophiles in the military, Civil Service and politics.
It was later claimed the RUC had been informed of the abuse at the home years earlier but did nothing.
Mr Massey was 16 when he was sent to Kincora.
He told the BBC: "The mornings were the worst times. I didn't start work until 10 o'clock.
"The other two guys who shared the room were up at half six in the morning and gone by seven.

Video: Kincora - Did MI5 use the abuse of young men to manipulate people in high places – UUP leader Mike Nesbitt
source: Belfast Telegraph
360p low
01:17
"I didn't wake up until half eight. That was when McGrath had me at his mercy. There was nobody in the house except for just those three men and me."
Mr Massey has long suspected the full story of what happened at Kincora has not been revealed.
"The authorities knew what was going on," he added.
"When I walked in there, there were people high up who knew exactly what I was walking into.
"They just let me walk into it."
Ulster Unionist leader Mike Nesbitt said he was writing to Prime Minister David Cameron urging him to include Kincora in the inquiry.
However, Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness said there should be an independent, international inquiry.
Background
Kincora Boys' Home on the Newtownards Road in east Belfast was the scene of a notorious child abuse scandal. In December 1981 three former employees at the home were jailed for abusing boys there. Among them was William McGrath, a former house master at Kincora and a leading Orangeman. There have long been claims of a cover-up to protect senior establishment figures linked to Kincora.
Further reading
From the archives

ORANGE ORDER KKKULTURE





Please forgive me, but after all the serious stuff of the last week, I have to do something silly to unwind. Please understand this is not meant as any offence to a great Irish republican, nor is it meant to cultivate sectarianism. I am not sectarian but for fucks sake, Ban the sectarian Orange Order KKKulture of hate.


Seany
Anyone with half a brain doesnt care what kind of Christian another fellow is, which church one goes to makes no difference in reality. The implanted Scotts and English are so stupid they think each sect of Christianity has a different God and their God is the right one. There must be a massive amount of inbreeding going on to keep producing retards over and over.

Once Again, Israel is Defeated
By Gilad Atzmon 

July 15, 2014 "ICH" -  As the Israeli Cabinet announced earlier today that it accepted the Egyptian cease-fire offer, Palestinian freedom fighters in Gaza continued firing rockets targeting the whole of Israel. 
The situation is clear.  Israel is desperate for a break in the violence. In spite of its endless ‘bravado,’ and military might, Israel lacks the military capacity and the courage to encounter Palestinian resistance on the ground. The Israeli elite recognizes that the military can’t resolve the problem, if anything, its extensive use would diminish Israeli manoeuvrability on the international front.
Hamas, on the other hand, has won its biggest military, political and ideological victory to date - it has managed to deliver some elementary messages to all of Israeli society:
You are living on our Palestinian stolen land, our Right to Return is elementary and is not negotiable. You Israelis do not belong here, you never did, and you had better consider your options immediately.
Hamas has also managed to dismantle the BDS / Jewish Lefty’s desperate and blatantly deceitful attempt to present the conflict as an issue over the ‘1967 occupation.’  The range and targets of Palestinian missiles deliver a clear message to both Israelis and their controlled opposition agents within the Left. Palestine is a stretch of land between the river and the sea. In other words, no more empty talk on ‘conflict resolutions.’ It is either Israel or Palestine. And today it seems Palestine it will be. 
Hamas’ strategy in the last week has displayed a rare genius in the method it used to capitalise on Israel’s superior technology and the Iron Dome in particular.  What could be smarter or more ethical than putting Israel under a constant barrage of rockets, delivering your essential message with missiles, yet knowing that no one will be hurt?
 
In the past week Hamas has managed to utilise Israeli technology and to integrate Israeli engineering into its operational tactics. This is a unique significant tactical achievement that proves that the Palestinian leadership in Gaza is significantly more sophisticated than their counterparts in Jerusalem
This is a repetition of a familiar Jewish historical and cultural pattern.  By the time the Jewish elite is convinced that its domination is established, a disaster is immanent. As Israel came to believe that it had bought itself the final and ultimate technological answer to Palestinian ballistic resistance, it has been devastated to discover that it has lost the war on every possible front: militarily, technologically, politically and ethically. 

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

IRISH BLOG JOURNALIST AUTHOR ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS




I Brian Clarke author of  the Irish Blog have been the target of British Secret Service Dirty Tricks for quite some time now. A week ago on Facebook, it came to my attention, that a story has been in circulation, that I have asked a young woman to send me her knickers 15 times by message. I do not know this woman and neither is she on my friends lists. 


Nothing particularly surprising there. An obvious Dirty Tricks tactic from MI5 who want to shut Irish Blog down and have been conducting a more subtle censorship on it for quite some time, aside from slowing it down with their intranets. What has been surprising though is the response to it. I still have some very loyal support and solidarity and believe me at times like this I really appreciate it.


I am not going to name people for obvious reasons. I do have transcripts of these conversations and while the individuals concerned may have been under the influence of drugs they may have also been the victims of MI5 hacking, like the poor lady who originally received the abuse by Facebook messaging in a case of obvious text hacking. I personally do not know the precise details.


While I would normally dismiss MI5 dirty tricks as part of the territory but it has been combined, with several recent attempts on my life by contrived road accidents. I have my own ideas on all of this but without evidence I cannot prove anything, other than the transcripts. However all of this has eerie similarities of other organizations, including the Provisionals working with MI5, using other republican, loyalist groups and individuals, as fronts for disinformation and assassination. I believe drugs are playing a leading part in corrupting Irish republicanism. 



 If anyone genuinely needs help with recovery from this they will have my full support as I have personal first hand experience of this problem. 



British spies used 'dirty tricks' including 'honey traps and deleting online profiles' to intimidate and trap enemies according to leaked Snowden documents 

  • Revelations from documents taken from NSA leaked by Edward Snowden
  • Outline techniques used by Joint Threat Research and Intelligence Group
  • Spy unit whose goal is to 'destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt' enemies
"British spies employed 'dirty tricks' including 'honey traps' to trap nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers, according to leaked documents. 
The bombshell revelations have been made public through the release of documents taken from the National Security Agency by whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
The Powerpoint slides outline techniques apparently used by the Joint Threat Research and Intelligence Group (JTRIG), a British spy unit whose goal is to 'destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt' enemies. 
British spies employed 'dirty tricks' including honey traps' in a bid to trap nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers
British spies employed 'dirty tricks' including honey traps' in a bid to trap nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers
The slides from 2010 and 2012, published by NBC News show that the JTRIG completed their mission by 'discrediting' adversaries through misinformation and hacking their communications.
Two main methods of attack detailed in the 'Effects' campaigns are cyber operations and propaganda campaigns. 
The bombshell revelations have been made public through the release of documents taken from the National Security Agency by whistleblower Edward Snowden
The bombshell revelations have been made public through the release of documents taken from the National Security Agency by whistleblower Edward Snowden
JTRIG, which is part of the NSA’s British counterpart, the cyber spy agency known as GCHQ, used Twitter, Flickr, Facebook and YouTube for deception, mass messaging and 'pushing stories'.
Another strategy is 'false flag' operations - this is when British agents carry out online actions that are designed to look like they were performed by one of Britain’s adversaries.
The main cyber attack is the ‘distributed denial of service’ (DDoS) attack.
This is when computers are taken over by hackers and they bombard a website’s host computers with requests for information causing it to crash - this is a method successfully used by Wikileaks hackers. 
Earlier this week it was revealed that JTRIG agents issued their DDoS on Anonymous chat rooms, preventing its users from communicating with one another. 
In one case, reported the BBC, agents are said to have tricked a hacker nicknamed P0ke who claimed to have stolen data from the US government. They did this by sending him a link to a BBC article entitled: 'Who loves the hacktivists?'
Eric King, an attorney who currently teaches IT law at the London School of Economics, told NBC it is 'remarkable' that the GCHQ has become so adept at launching DDoS attacks without 'clear lawful authority,'  particularly because the British government has criticised similar strategies used by other governments.
'GCHQ has no clear authority to send a virus or conduct cyber-attacks,' he said. 'Hacking is one of the most invasive methods of surveillance.'
According to notes on the 2012 documents, a computer virus called Ambassadors Reception was 'used in a variety of different areas' and was 'very effective.'
When sent to adversaries, says the presentation, the virus will 'encrypt itself, delete all emails, encrypt all files, make [the] screen shake' and block the computer user from logging on.
One of the ways to block a target communicating reads: 'Bombard their phone with text messages, bombard their phone with calls, delete their online presence, block up their fax machine.'
The slide details examples of how this was used in Afghanistan including significantly disrupting the Taliban, sending targets a text message 'every 10 seconds or so' and 'calling targets on a regular basis'.
The British cyber spies also used blog posts and information spread via blogs in an operation against Iran.
Mobile phone user
A young woman looking at Facebook website on laptop computer
One of the ways to stop a target communicating reads: 'Bombard their phone with text messages, bombard their phone with calls, delete their online presence, block up their fax machine'
The same 2012 presentation describes the 'honey trap' method of discrediting a target commenting it is 'very successful' when it works. 
The individual is lured 'to go somewhere on the internet, or a physical location' where they are then 'met by a friendly face.'
It does not give any examples of when the honey trap has been used by British agents, but the same slide also details how 'paranoia' can be heightened by changing a target's photo on a social networking website - the slide reads 'You have been warned JTRIG is about!' 
A programme called 'Royal Concierge' took advantage of hotel reservation systems to track the  location of foreign diplomats and the slides encourage agents to monitor targets through 'close access technical operations'.
It also suggests they question 'Can we influence hotel choice? Can we cancel their visits?'
According to reports in Der Spiegel last year, British intelligence tapped the reservations systems of over 350 top hotels around the world for the past three years to set up the programme. 
Using the GCHQ’s SIGINT (signal-intelligence) program it was used to spy on trade delegations, foreign diplomats, and other targets with a taste for the high life.
NBC news reported GCHQ would not comment on the newly published documents or on JTRIG’s operations. 
In a statement it told them: 'All of GCHQ's work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework,' said the statement, 'which ensure[s] that our activities are authorized, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the Secretary of State, the Interception and Intelligence Services Commissioners and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee. All of our operational processes rigorously support this position.' "

TO WHOM IT CONCERNS, THERE IS A DOSSIER THAT WILL BE MADE PUBLIC REGARDING ALL DIRTY TRICKS CONDUCTED ON MYSELF BRIAN CLARKE, BY ALL BRITISH SECRET SERVICE AGENTS, SINCE FIRST I MET GERRY CONLON IN LONDON MANY YEARS AGO, THAT WILL BE MADE PUBLIC IN THE EVENT OF MY UNTIMELY DEATH

UK's NEW SURVEILLANCE BILL 'It defies belief': SNOWDEN



'It defies belief': Snowden condemns UK’s new surveillance bill


Edward Snowden.(AFP Photo / NBC)
Edward Snowden.(AFP Photo / NBC)
During an exclusive interview in Moscow with the Guardian, the whistleblower suggested it was highly unusual for a state to process legislation so hastily other than at a time of acutely endangered national security.
"I mean we don't have bombs falling. We don't have U-boats in the harbour”, he emphasised. Yet suddenly this legislation has become an absolute priority. "It defies belief", he stated.
Snowden found the duress with which the UK government processed the Data Retention and Investigation Powers Bill to be remarkable, comparing it to the Bush administration’s introduction of the Protect America Act in 2007. The Protect America Act was issued after the New York Times exposed a“warrantless wire-tapping programme” that was both illegal and“unconstitutional”, he said.
The UK government claims Britain’s emergency bill will preserve UK law enforcement and intelligence agencies’ access to data that is vital for “protecting national security and preventing serious crime.” According to Snowden, the case the US administration built to justify the Protection of America Act is notably similar.
"I mean the NSA could have written this draft…They passed it under the same sort of emergency justification. They said we would be at risk. They said companies will no longer cooperate with us."
Whitehall’s rhetoric of UK intelligence services’ diminished investigative powers in a climate of potential terror threats is certainly reminiscent of the Bush administration’s claims in 2007. As Snowden notes, both governments cited intelligence services’ waning assistance from internet and telecom companies in a climate of looming terrorist threats as requiring swift and decisive action.
View of the National Security Agency (NSA) in the Washington.(AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards)
View of the National Security Agency (NSA) in the Washington.(AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards)

And like Britain's emergency surveillance legislation, this US' Protection of America Act 2007 was enacted in the absence of fair and open public debate, .
Snowden’s observations reflect the concerns of myriad UK civil liberties groups who are acutely skeptical about coalition claims the legislation is temporary and will not adversely compromise the privacy rights of Britons.
In an effort to secure cross-party backing from Labour and the Liberal Democrats, Prime Minister David Cameron vowed the legislation would not entail an extension of the state’s surveillance powers. But according to the Guardian, internal Home Office documents appear to indicate that that British authorities’ surveillance powers will be expanded.
During his recent interview – a rare occurrence since he secured asylum in Russia almost a year ago - Snowden commented that Britain’s emergency legislation marked “a significant change” in Britain’s surveillance landscape. He also questioned why the UK government were pushing it through shortly after a European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling confirmed existing surveillance measures were overly intrusive.
"If these surveillance authorities are so interested, so invasive, the courts are actually saying they violate fundamental rights, do we really want to authorize them on a new, increased and more intrusive scale without any public debate?”
Reflecting on a year-long government silence following his exposure of the depth and scale of NSA-GCHQ oversight, Snowden stated that Britain’s new surveillance legislation effectively “looks like it was written by the National Security Agency”.
The UK government has justified the new legislation on the grounds of feared terrorist activities emanating from an alleged member of Al-Qaida in Yemen linked to fundamentalist Islamist groups in Iraq and Syria.
The Tories deny this bill raises privacy concerns, stating it does not necessitate public debate. Both Labour and the Liberal Democrats have demonstrated hesitance in contributing to public debate on the matter, perhaps fearful of repercussions they might endure were a terrorist attack to occur.
Despite having expert knowledge of surveillance and the agencies that sustain it, Snowden’s comments are unlikely to phase many UK parliamentarians. While his revelations sparked inquiries waged by two separate parliamentary committees, the privacy rights advocate is yet to garner vocal support among UK MPs.
Campaigners, opposed to the UK’s new surveillance bill, argue it contains unprecedented power for Britain to demand foreign companies comply with warrants for interception. It also increases the government’s leverage to acquire sensitive communications data, they insist.

Comments (68)


L 14.07.2014 19:19

When you r8pe your subjects for hundreds of years, you get a little bored, so you then r8pe the children! then you get caught and you get worried that the legality of your many actions will soon be brought to light, thus legalise what we can before its lock down!!!
Not that any of that matters as the sheeple are so far gone that the power elite can do what ever they want whenever they want for as long as they want without any real reprise from the masses, as they just don't care, or pretend if they see nothing then they say nothing then there is no problem! Sick!

Nigel Howard 14.07.2014 19:13

The UK and US have lost their edge internationally. All they can bank on is the advantage of eavesdropping on everyone else's online activities and phone calls. This and only this, gives them an advantage in today's rapidly changing global marketplace. This illegal, 'omniscient' power, makes them like God, when in fact all they're doing is spying on their own citizens and spying on the economic activity of their competitors. Insider trading and an entire host of other organized crime is their forte and M.O. They can't possibly compete with a level playing field.

The game's fixed. 

The outcome is never in doubt.